Skip to main content
Tenders

Section of Ežero Street (Nr. KR7155) for transport communication purposes in Plutiškės village, Plutiškės eldership, Kazlų

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7059810
Value
€70,248
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€70,248
Duration
4 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Section of Ežero Street (Nr. KR7155) for transport communication purposes in Plutiškės village, Plutiškės eldership, Kazlų
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Pasiulymo formaDOC
0.5 PD sąlygų 5 priedas.docx

This document is a tender offer form for the capital repair of a section of Ežero Street in Kazlų Rūda municipality, requiring the bidder to provide their company information, confirm agreement with tender conditions, and state the total offer price including VAT.

Laisvos formos deklaracijaDOC
0.7 Priedas Nr.7.1_Laisvos formos deklaracija...

This document contains a free-form declaration for the bidder to confirm their compliance with qualification and environmental management system requirements for the tender regarding a section of Ežero street.

DeklaracijaDOC
0.7 Priedas Nr.7.2_Deklaracija.docx

This document is a declaration by the bidder confirming that their offer does not fall under any of the grounds for rejection specified in the Public Procurement Law.

Darbuotojų sąrašasDOC
0.8 Pirkimo sąlygų 8 priedas.docx

This document requires the bidder to provide a list of their employees (specialists) and includes specific instructions regarding subcontractors.

Sutarčių sąrašasDOC
0.9 PD sąlygų 9 priedas.docx

This document contains a list of works or contracts that bidders must fill out, detailing their experience as a general contractor, partner, or subcontractor, with specific instructions for joint ventures and emphasis on truthful information.

Konkurso sąlygosPDF
0 Skelbiamos apklausos SS.pdf

This document contains the special conditions for a low-value public procurement tender for the capital repair of a section of Ežero Street in Kazlų Rūda municipality.

NoticePDF
Notice_7059810.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the capital repair of a section of Ežero Street in Plutiškės, Lithuania, involving pavement replacement.

DKZ 1XLS
0.2.1 DKZ (Ežero g. Plutiškių k.).xlsx

This document contains a bill of quantities for the capital repair of Ežero Street in Plutiškės village, Kazlų Rūda municipality, detailing various construction and excavation works.

DKZ 2XLS
0.2.2 DKZ.xlsx

This document contains a bill of quantities for the capital repair of Ežero Street in Plutiškės, Kazlų Rūda municipality.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7059810_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for the Ežero g. section in Kazlų Rūda, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road repair works is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations. The process appears fair and compliant with standard procurement practices.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is a point of concern. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The tender description is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached forms and documents. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity in how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and a comprehensive set of required documents. However, the 'reveal date' is missing, which is a minor gap in completeness.

Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full document access and discloses the estimated value. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied by the mandatory forms) contributes to fairness. Deadlines are present and appear reasonable for the scope.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.

No e-submission explicitly stated (though 'E-Procurement' characteristic is present)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of specific sustainability focus.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive documentation package
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Active status and e-procurement characteristic

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
Absence of contract start date and financing details

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Incorporate sustainability aspects into future tenders.
3. Provide contract start date and financing information for better bidder planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline