Skip to main content
Tenders

Panevėžys RK-1 steam boiler No. 6 capital repair works (tender announced)

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7057350
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
70
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Replacement of economizer heating tubes of Panevėžys RK-1 steam boiler No. 6
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Entities holding special or exclusive rights
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Replacement of economizer heating tubes of steam boiler No. 6 at Panevėžys RK-1
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--0.0 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentai PK-D26 org. (Panevezio RK-1 GK-6 remontas ).docxDOC
Pirkimo dokumentai PK-D26 org. (Panevezio RK-... -- 99.0 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7057350.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the replacement of economizer heating tubes for steam boiler No. 6 at Panevėžys RK-1, with the contracting authority being AB "Panevėžio energija".

technine.specifikacijaV.pdfPDF
technine.specifikacijaV.pdf -- 2.4 MB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7057350_1.xml

This document contains the complete tender structure for an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation, requiring a file submission.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

70
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for steam boiler repairs exhibits good basic compliance and fairness but suffers from a lack of detailed technical requirements and a strong focus on sustainability.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules and uses appropriate CPV codes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance seems to be met based on available information.

Clarity70/100

The tender title and basic description are clear. However, the AI-extracted requirements lack detail, particularly concerning technical specifications beyond the general scope and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, which reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified in AI-extracted requirements.
Completeness65/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, and contract duration are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial documents (Pirkimo dokumentai, technine.specifikacijaV.pdf) have no content extracted, significantly impacting completeness.

Estimated Value is not disclosed.
Content for essential tender documents is not extracted.
Fairness80/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, ensuring broad access. The value is not disclosed, which is a slight concern for transparency. The requirement for 'Entities holding special or exclusive rights' is a potential fairness issue if not universally applicable or justified, though it's a legal form categorization.

Value not disclosed.
Potential specificity in 'Legal form' requirement that might limit competition.
Practicality60/100

The tender is flagged as 'E-Procurement,' suggesting e-submission capability. Contract duration is specified. However, the 'Missing reveal date' and lack of explicit financing information reduce practicality. The deadline could be considered tight for a complex repair if detailed documentation is needed.

Missing reveal date.
Financing information is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated correctly. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The financial value being zero in AI extraction is a data artifact, not an issue with the tender itself.

Sustainability30/100

The tender lacks any explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which typically aligns with broader sustainability goals. This score reflects the absence of these common sustainability considerations.

No green procurement considerations mentioned.
No social criteria or innovation focus evident.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Use of open procedure and appropriate CPV code.
E-procurement is utilized.
Basic contract duration is specified.

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical requirements and evaluation criteria.
Estimated value is not disclosed.
Essential tender documents have no extracted content.
Absence of sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical specifications and clear evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and fully extractable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline