Skip to main content
Tenders

Territory and object protection services

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
7053200
Value
€2,871,339
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Tender Opening

April 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€2,871,339
Duration
36 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is divided into 2 parts: Part 1 – territory and object protection services (Vaidoto g. 209,

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
Pirkimo dokumentai.7z

This document contains the draft contract and application forms for the procurement of territory and object security services.

NoticePDF
Notice_7053200.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for territory and object security services for the Lithuanian Army's Special Operations Forces Vytautas the Great Jäger Battalion, divided into two lots.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7053200_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a restricted tender procedure with two lots, focusing on security services, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for security services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks detailed eligibility and technical requirements, and the sustainability aspects are not explicitly addressed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness for a restricted procedure could be debated. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type (Restricted) is specified.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement object is clear, and the tender is divided into parts. Key documents like the contract draft and application forms are available. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are attached. However, crucial sections like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements are marked as 'No information provided', significantly impacting completeness.

Mandatory exclusion grounds not provided
Eligibility requirements not provided
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is restricted, which is a standard practice. The division into parts is also a positive aspect for fairness. However, the lack of detailed requirements makes it difficult to assess the objectivity of criteria.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and raises practical concerns. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are reported. Dates appear logical within the provided context.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Tender documents are available
E-Procurement is indicated

Concerns

Critical missing information on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of specified evaluation criteria
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with the e-procurement characteristic.
3. Specify the evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline