Creation of a virtual reality game and virtual reality demonstration

This tender for VR game development has a clear objective and estimated value, but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and clear submission instructions within the accessible documents, impacting overall transparency and completeness.

The tender appears to adhere to general procurement principles. Deadlines are set, and the procedure is indicated as open. However, the absence of explicit mention of dispute resolution mechanisms or specific regulatory compliance details within the provided summary limits a comprehensive assessment. The CPV code is present.

The core requirement for developing a VR game for online demonstration is clear. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the fact that key tender documents (like technical specifications and qualification requirements) are not directly accessible or summarized makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the decision-making process.

While basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present, crucial details regarding eligibility, financial requirements, and submission procedures are missing from the AI extraction. The fact that 13 documents are listed but many are summarized as 'No content extracted' significantly impacts completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The procedure is e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria can be perceived as a fairness concern as it leaves room for subjective judgment.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the specific URL for document access or submission is not provided in the extracted information, and the submission deadline is relatively short given the nature of the project, potentially impacting bidder feasibility.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logically ordered (submission before opening). There are no flags for suspension or disputes. The CPV code and NUTS code are present and seem appropriate.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria within the provided information. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability aspects.