Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Administration services for the promotion of respondents of the Lithuanian Long-Term Social Survey

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7042610
Value
€704,342
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 21, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Tender Opening

April 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€704,342
Duration
35 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The subject of the procurement is administration services for the promotion of respondents of the Lithuanian Long-Term Social Survey.
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on respondent incentive administration for a long-term social study, with price being the sole evaluation criterion. Winning requires a highly competitive price, efficient operational delivery, and robust data protection measures. Leveraging existing infrastructure and streamlined processes will be key to achieving cost leadership.

Key Winning Messages

Unbeatable Value: Delivering the most cost-effective solution for respondent incentive administration.

Reliable Execution: Ensuring seamless and secure management of participant rewards and communications.

Trusted Partner: Demonstrating unwavering commitment to data privacy and regulatory compliance.

Key Opportunities
Sole evaluation criterion is price, creating a clear path to victory for the lowest bidder.
Green procurement requirement allows for differentiation through sustainable operational practices, even if not explicitly evaluated.
The CPV code (79570000) suggests a market where established players may have economies of scale, but niche providers can still compete on efficiency.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the sole evaluation criterion.

Conduct thorough cost analysis to identify all potential cost savings. Explore efficiencies in logistics, technology, and staffing. Consider offering tiered pricing or value-added services that do not significantly increase core costs but enhance perceived value.

Ensuring absolute compliance with data protection regulations (GDPR) given the sensitive nature of personal data.

Thoroughly review and implement the measures outlined in DOCUMENT 2. Conduct internal audits and training on data security. Clearly articulate the robust technical and organizational measures in the bid proposal.

Lack of specified technical or eligibility requirements might lead to a broad range of competitors, increasing uncertainty.

Focus on demonstrating core competencies in administrative services, data handling, and logistics. Highlight past experience with similar projects, even if not explicitly requested. Proactively address potential concerns about capability through detailed descriptions of operational processes.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced provider of administrative services, particularly in managing large-scale participant engagement or reward programs. They should possess strong logistical capabilities, a proven track record in data security and compliance (especially GDPR), and the ability to offer a highly competitive price point due to efficient operations and potentially economies of scale. Familiarity with Lithuanian public procurement processes is advantageous.
Key Requirements
Accurate and competitive pricing for incentive administration services.
Robust personal data processing security measures.
Compliance with exclusion grounds (no Russian participation, no sanctions).
Demonstrated capability to manage respondent invitations and reward distribution.
Adherence to the 35-month contract duration.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrably lowest cost per respondent incentive administered.
Exceptional data security protocols and a clear, concise explanation of these measures.
Proactive and efficient communication strategy for respondent engagement.
Commitment to sustainable operational practices (e.g., digital communication where possible, eco-friendly materials for any physical rewards).
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to utilizing digital channels for communication and reward distribution wherever feasible to minimize environmental impact, aligning with the 'Green Procurement' aspect. If physical rewards are necessary, commit to sourcing them from local, sustainable suppliers. Quantify the expected reduction in carbon footprint.
Bid Focus Areas
Offer Price100%

Develop a highly competitive price by meticulously analyzing all cost components. Benchmark against similar services and identify opportunities for operational efficiencies. Ensure the price is sustainable for the 35-month duration while remaining the lowest.

Recommendations6
Aggressively Price to Win
CriticalHigh effort

Given that price is the sole evaluation criterion, dedicate significant resources to cost modeling and optimization. Identify all potential cost-saving opportunities in operations, logistics, and administration. Aim to be the lowest bidder while ensuring profitability and service quality.

Directly determines bid success.
Fortify Data Security and Privacy
CriticalMed effort

Thoroughly review and implement the technical and organizational security measures for personal data processing as detailed in DOCUMENT 2. Clearly articulate these measures in the bid, emphasizing compliance with GDPR and the protection of respondent data.

Essential for meeting tender requirements and building trust.
Highlight Operational Efficiency
HighMed effort

Even with price as the sole criterion, demonstrate how your operational efficiency translates into cost savings for the contracting authority. Detail streamlined processes for invitation sending, reward distribution, and query management.

Reinforces the value proposition and justifies a competitive price.
Integrate Green Procurement Commitments
MediumLow effort

Actively incorporate and highlight sustainable practices in your service delivery, as required by the 'Green Procurement' clause. This could include digital communication, eco-friendly reward sourcing, or waste reduction in operations. Quantify these benefits where possible.

Meets a stated tender requirement and can subtly influence perception.
Scrutinize Exclusion Grounds
HighLow effort

Ensure strict adherence to the mandatory exclusion grounds, particularly regarding Russian participation and international sanctions, as per DOCUMENT 1. Provide all necessary declarations and evidence to demonstrate full compliance.

Prevents disqualification.
Develop a Clear and Concise Proposal
MediumMed effort

While the evaluation is price-based, a well-structured and easy-to-understand proposal that clearly addresses all requirements (especially data security and exclusion grounds) will leave a positive impression and reduce ambiguity for the evaluators.

Enhances clarity and professionalism.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider without compromising on security or reliability. Emphasize lean operations and economies of scale that enable the lowest price. Contrast this with potentially higher-cost providers who may not be able to match the price point.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

11 priedas_Sutarties projektasDOC
11 priedas_Sutarties projektas.docx

This document contains the special and general conditions of a service purchase and sale agreement, defining terms, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy for the procurement of respondent engagement administration services for a Lithuanian long-term social study.

12 priedas_Tiekėjo subtiekėjo deklaracijos formaDOC
12 priedas_Tiekėjo subtiekejo deklaracijos fo...

This document is a declaration form for a supplier/subcontractor to confirm they do not have Russian participation exceeding EU regulations and are not subject to international sanctions.

13 priedas_Asmens duomenų pagalbinio tvarkymo sutartisDOC
13 priedas_Asmens duomenų pagalbinio tvarkymo...

This document contains the technical and organizational security measures for processing personal data as an appendix to a personal data processing agreement for the administration of respondent incentives for a long-term social study.

1 priedas_TerminaiDOC
1 priedas_Terminai.docx

No content extracted

2 priedas_Techninė specifikacijaDOC
2 priedas_Techninė specifikacija.docx

This document contains the technical specification for the administration of respondent incentives for the Lithuanian Long-Term Social Survey, outlining the scope of services, responsibilities, and payment terms.

3 priedas_Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindaiDOC
3 priedas_Tiekėjų pašalinimo pagrindai.doc...

This document outlines the grounds for excluding bidders from the procurement process for respondent engagement administration services for the Lithuanian long-term social survey, specifying when and how exclusion criteria are applied and what documentation is required.

4 priedas_Kvalifikacijos reikalavimaiDOC
4_priedas_Kvalifikacijos reikalavimai.docx

This document outlines the supplier qualification requirements and quality/environmental management system standards for the procurement of respondent engagement administration services for a long-term Lithuanian social study.

5 priedas_EBVPDDOC
5 priedas_EBVPD.docx

This document is Annex 5, the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), which is prepared online and saved in HML and PDF formats for tender submissions.

6 priedas_Pasiūlymo formaDOC
6 priedas_Pasiūlymo forma.docx

This document is a tender offer form for administrative services for respondent incentives in the Lithuanian long-term social study, requiring bidders to confirm compliance with tender conditions and provide pricing.

7 priedas_Pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijaiDOC
7 priedas_Pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai.docx

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for tender proposals, focusing on the total price in Euros with VAT as the primary factor for determining the most economically advantageous offer.

NoticePDF
Notice_7042610.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for administrative services related to respondent engagement for the Lithuanian Long-Term Social Survey, including address list creation and postal dispatch.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for respondent engagement administration services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, though it lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria beyond price and has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines are present, and the organization is a public law entity. The absence of disputes and a clear procedure contribute positively. However, the AI flags a missing reveal date, which could be a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title and description of the services. Key documents like the technical specification, contract draft, and evaluation criteria (though only price is explicitly mentioned) are available. The requirements are generally understandable, but the AI notes a lack of specific criteria beyond price.

No evaluation criteria specified (beyond price)
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and a list of 11 tender documents. However, the AI flags that the '1 priedas_Terminai' document has no extracted content, and specific exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are not detailed within the AI's extraction, suggesting they might be within the attached documents but not summarized.

Missing content in '1 priedas_Terminai'
Specific detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) not explicitly summarized
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of ESPD (European Single Procurement Document) and the availability of all 11 documents suggest a fair process. The evaluation criteria, while primarily focused on price, are documented. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', indicating electronic submission is likely. The contract duration is specified. However, the AI flags 'No e-submission' which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. Financing information and a clear contract start date are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission (marked as 'E-Procurement' but AI flags 'No e-submission')
Financing information not explicitly detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a moderate focus on sustainability aspects.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and open procedure
Comprehensive set of 11 tender documents provided
Estimated value and contract duration clearly stated
Use of ESPD indicates adherence to EU standards

Concerns

Lack of detailed evaluation criteria beyond price
Ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Limited explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify the evaluation criteria beyond price to ensure transparency.
2. Confirm and detail the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability objectives into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline