Skip to main content
Tenders

8-seater minibus

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7037900
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
7 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Body type – 9-seater passenger van with driver, front doors for driver and
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
1priedas.Pasiulymo_forma.docx

This document contains a bid proposal form for the sale of a minibus, requiring the bidder to agree to tender conditions and provide pricing and subcontractor information.

Techninė specifikacijaDOC
2priedas.Technine_specifikacija.docx

No content extracted

Sutarties projektasDOC
3priedas.Sutarties_projektas.docx

This document contains a draft contract for the purchase and sale of goods, detailing terms related to price, payment, quality, warranty, delivery, and liability.

Pasiūlymų vertinimo tvarkaDOC
4priedas.Pasiulymu vertinimo tvarka.docx

This document outlines the procedure for evaluating bids, focusing on criteria such as price, operating costs, quality, and delivery time to determine the most economically advantageous offer.

Atitikimo deklaracijaDOC
5priedas.Atitikimo-Deklaracija.docx

This document is a declaration of conformity required from the bidder to confirm adherence to the technical specifications for a 9-seater passenger van with a driver.

Duomenys pasiūlymų vertinimuiDOC
6priedas.Duomenys_pasiulymu_vertinimui.docx

This document contains a form for bidders to provide data for the evaluation of their proposals based on economic advantage criteria, including price, fuel consumption, warranty, safety equipment, and delivery time.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Skelbiamos apklausos pirkimo salygos.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for a passenger van, outlining general provisions, the object of procurement, supplier exclusion grounds, qualification requirements, bid preparation, submission, and evaluation procedures.

NoticePDF
Notice_7037900.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of an 8-seater minibus by VŠĮ Klaipėdos Ernesto Galvanausko Profesinio mokymo centras in Lithuania, with detailed technical specifications and submission requirements.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7037900_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a mandatory file upload.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an 8-seater minibus is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a defined procedure. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including the use of a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the vehicle is clear, and most requirements are documented within the provided tender documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main tender notice reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and attached documents. The primary missing element is the estimated value of the procurement, which affects the completeness of financial information.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender provides access to all necessary documents and specifies the e-procurement nature of the process. Criteria for evaluation are not fully detailed, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies. The undisclosed value could be a concern for some bidders.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. It is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the object of purchase
Comprehensive set of required tender documents
E-procurement enabled
Proper CPV code utilization

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria in the tender notice.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline