Procurement of environmental monitoring program implementation services for Pakruojis District Municipality (Announced)

This tender for environmental monitoring services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a defined contract duration. The deadline, while short, is within typical parameters for this type of procurement. No disputes are indicated.

The title and description clearly outline the subject of the procurement. Key documents like the technical specification and draft contract are provided, offering good insight into the requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The availability of five key documents (notice, technical specification, contract draft, and two form templates) enhances completeness. However, the lack of explicit details on exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements within the provided text is a notable omission.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for evaluation, though not explicitly stated, are implied to be lowest price based on the XML document description. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. The contract duration is specified. However, the provided text does not explicitly detail the contract start date, financing information, or confirm e-submission functionality beyond the general 'E-Procurement' characteristic.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.