Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

(PI­11655/26) Environmental Impact Assessment Services Selection

Open
Deadline
1849 days left
April 27, 2031
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
7027610
Value
€500,000
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2031

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2031

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€500,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€771,462
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
989 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

(PI­11655/26) Environmental Impact Assessment Services Selection to create a dynamic procurement
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) services for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS). The strategy should focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, a strong understanding of EIA processes for infrastructure (implied by the contracting authority 'Kelių priežiūra' - Road Maintenance), and a commitment to green procurement principles, even though specific evaluation criteria are not yet defined. Leveraging experience with similar infrastructure projects and highlighting efficiency will be key.

Key Winning Messages

Expert EIA services tailored for infrastructure development, ensuring compliance and sustainability.

Efficient and reliable EIA delivery within a Dynamic Purchasing System framework.

Commitment to environmental best practices and contributing to 'Kelių priežiūra's' green objectives.

Key Opportunities
The tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), indicating a need for ongoing, flexible service provision. Bidders can position themselves as a long-term, reliable partner.
The CPV code 'Poveikio aplinkai vertinimas (ne statyboms)' (Environmental impact assessment (not for construction)) suggests a focus on non-construction related environmental assessments, which might include strategic environmental assessments or impact assessments for operational activities, rather than purely project-based construction EIAs.
The contracting authority is 'AB „Kelių priežiūra“' (Road Maintenance), implying a strong likelihood that the EIA services will be related to road networks, maintenance activities, or associated environmental management, allowing for specialized tailoring of proposals.
The 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' flag indicates a clear expectation for environmentally conscious solutions and practices, offering an opportunity to highlight sustainability initiatives.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring. Bidders must anticipate potential criteria and address them proactively.

Focus on demonstrating excellence across all mandatory and implied requirements. Assume criteria will include technical expertise, experience, methodology, and potentially price. Highlight all strengths comprehensively.

The tender is 'Ribotas' (Restricted), meaning only pre-qualified or invited bidders can participate. If a bidder is not pre-qualified, they may need to explore other avenues or ensure they meet the implicit pre-qualification standards.

Thoroughly review all documentation for any pre-qualification requirements or implicit criteria. Ensure all eligibility and exclusion grounds are meticulously addressed. If unsure, seek clarification from the contracting authority.

The estimated value of 500,000 EUR over an unspecified duration suggests a need for cost-effectiveness and efficient service delivery, but without a defined duration, pricing can be complex.

Develop a pricing strategy that reflects value for money and efficiency. Consider offering tiered pricing or service packages that can adapt to varying needs within the DPS. Clearly articulate the cost-effectiveness of your approach.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A specialized environmental consultancy with proven experience in conducting EIA studies, particularly for road infrastructure or similar public works projects. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record of working within public procurement frameworks, possess a team of accredited environmental experts, and demonstrate a commitment to sustainable practices and efficient service delivery.
Key Requirements
Demonstrated technical capability in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) services.
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds.
Meeting Eligibility Requirements.
Meeting Financial Requirements.
Adherence to Submission Requirements.
Understanding of Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) principles.
Commitment to Green Procurement.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated expertise in EIA for road infrastructure and maintenance, aligning directly with the contracting authority's core business.
A proactive approach to sustainability and green procurement, going beyond minimum requirements.
A clear understanding and proposed methodology for operating effectively within a Dynamic Purchasing System.
Proven track record of delivering high-quality EIA reports efficiently and within budget.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local environmental specialists and contributing to local knowledge transfer in environmental assessment practices.
Proposing the use of digital tools and platforms to minimize paper usage and carbon footprint during the EIA process.
Offering training opportunities for junior environmental professionals within the bidder's organization or in collaboration with local institutions.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (implied)

Provide detailed resumes of key personnel, showcasing relevant experience in EIA for infrastructure. Outline a robust methodology for conducting EIAs, emphasizing accuracy, compliance, and efficiency. Include case studies of similar projects.

Experience (implied)

Highlight past successful EIA projects, particularly those involving public sector clients or road infrastructure. Quantify achievements where possible (e.g., number of EIAs completed, types of projects).

Green Procurement (explicit)

Detail specific measures and practices that will be implemented to ensure the EIA services are delivered in an environmentally responsible manner. This could include waste reduction, energy efficiency, and sustainable material sourcing for any site visits.

Understanding of DPS (implied)

Explain how the bidder's operational model is suited to a DPS, emphasizing flexibility, responsiveness, and efficient service provision. Outline how the bidder will manage communication and service delivery within the DPS framework.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address Technical Capability
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a comprehensive technical proposal that details the methodology for conducting EIAs, the qualifications and experience of the proposed team, and relevant case studies. Focus on expertise applicable to road infrastructure and environmental management.

Ensures compliance with a core requirement and demonstrates the bidder's ability to deliver the required services effectively.
Anticipate and Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume they will cover technical merit, experience, methodology, and value for money. Structure the bid to excel in these areas, providing clear evidence and quantifiable benefits.

Maximizes the chances of a favorable evaluation outcome even without explicit scoring weights.
Highlight Green Procurement Commitment
HighMed effort

Go beyond simply stating compliance with 'Green Procurement: Yes'. Detail specific initiatives and practices that will be implemented to ensure the EIA services themselves are delivered sustainably, such as digital reporting, reduced travel, or use of eco-friendly materials.

Demonstrates a proactive commitment to sustainability, aligning with the contracting authority's stated objectives and potentially differentiating the bid.
Clarify DPS Operational Model
HighMed effort

Clearly articulate the bidder's understanding of and readiness to operate within a Dynamic Purchasing System. This includes demonstrating flexibility, responsiveness, and efficient communication protocols.

Shows the contracting authority that the bidder is prepared for the procurement mechanism and can integrate seamlessly.
Integrate Local Employment and Knowledge Transfer
MediumLow effort

Propose commitments to employing local environmental specialists or offering training opportunities, aligning with potential, albeit unspecified, social value expectations and fostering local capacity.

Adds value beyond the core service and can be a positive differentiator, especially if social value is implicitly considered.
Address Restricted Procurement Nature
HighMed effort

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are meticulously documented and presented. If there's any doubt about meeting implicit pre-qualification standards for a restricted tender, seek clarification or ensure the bid is exceptionally strong in all stated areas.

Prevents disqualification due to non-compliance with fundamental tender rules.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically proficient and experienced provider of EIA services specifically relevant to road maintenance and infrastructure, emphasizing a deep understanding of 'Kelių priežiūra's' operational context.
Differentiate by showcasing a proactive and innovative approach to green procurement and sustainability, demonstrating a commitment that exceeds basic compliance.
Highlight the bidder's agility and readiness to operate within a Dynamic Purchasing System, presenting a streamlined and efficient service delivery model that offers excellent value for money.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

14 documents available with AI summaries

10 priedas Tinkamai suteiktų paslaugų sąrašas.docxDOC
10 priedas Tinkamai suteiktų paslaugų sąrašas... -- 63.0 KB

No content extracted

1 priedas Pašalinimo pagrindai.docxDOC
1 priedas Pašalinimo pagrindai.docx -- 54.1 KB

No content extracted

2 priedas Kvalifikacijos reikalavimai.docxDOC
2 priedas Kvalifikacijos reikalavimai.docx -- 28.9 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas Paraiskos forma.docxDOC
4 priedas Paraiskos forma.docx -- 34.9 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas Preliminari techninė specifikacija.docxDOC
5 priedas Preliminari techninė specifikacija.... -- 37.4 KB

No content extracted

6 priedas Tiekejo deklaracija juridiniam asmeniui.docxDOC
6 priedas Tiekejo deklaracija juridiniam asme... -- 62.8 KB

No content extracted

7 priedas Tiekejo deklaracija fiziniam asmeniui.docxDOC
7 priedas Tiekejo deklaracija fiziniam asmeni... -- 62.1 KB

No content extracted

8 priedas Laisvos formos deklaracijos minimos pirkimo sąlygų 8.3 p. pavyzdys.doc...DOC
8 priedas Laisvos formos deklaracijos minimos... -- 31.3 KB

No content extracted

9 priedas Specialistu_sarasas.docxDOC
9 priedas Specialistu_sarasas.docx -- 24.2 KB

No content extracted

DPS_sukūrimo sąlygos.docxDOC
DPS_sukūrimo sąlygos.docx -- 1.2 MB

No content extracted

3 priedas EBVPD.pdfPDF
3 priedas EBVPD.pdf -- 80.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7027610.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for environmental impact assessment services in Lithuania, establishing a dynamic purchasing system.

3 priedas espd-request.xmlXML
3 priedas espd-request.xml -- 102.5 KB

This document contains a preliminary technical specification for environmental impact assessment services.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7027610_1.xml

This document contains instructions and a mandatory field for bidders to fill out and submit their proposal in the first round of a restricted tender procedure for environmental impact assessment services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for environmental impact assessment services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a substantial number of supporting documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and financing.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and provides necessary classification codes. Deadlines are present, and the procedure type is specified. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance based on the provided data. The submission deadline appears to be unusually far in the future, which could be flagged as a potential issue depending on the context of a dynamic purchasing system.

Submission deadline is very far in the future (2031-04-27).
Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear, and CPV codes are provided. The AI-extracted requirements list general categories. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a clear contract duration impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders. The content of many attached documents is not summarized, hindering immediate understanding.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Content of several attached documents is not extracted or summarized.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code is present. A significant number of documents are attached. However, crucial details like the contract duration and specific financing information are missing, and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria also reduces completeness.

Missing contract duration.
Missing financing information.
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an e-procurement system, which promotes transparency. The estimated value is disclosed. The procedure is restricted, which is permissible, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies based on the provided information. Full document access is implied by the number of attachments.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender is identified as e-procurement, which is positive. However, there is no explicit mention of a contract start date, nor is the contract duration specified. The financing information is also absent. While documents are attached, a clear URL for e-submission beyond the general e-procurement mention could enhance practicality.

No contract start date specified.
Missing contract duration.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and CPV code are populated consistently. Dates are logically presented, although the submission deadline is very distant. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender does not indicate that it is EU funded. This area is therefore underdeveloped.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear basic information provided (title, reference, value, CPV).
Large number of attached tender documents.
E-procurement utilized.
Procedure type (Restricted) and directive (2014/24/EU) are specified.

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria.
Missing contract duration and start date.
Unusually distant submission deadline.
Lack of detail on sustainability aspects.

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide details on contract duration and potential start date.
3. Review the submission deadline to ensure it aligns with procurement best practices for a dynamic purchasing system.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline