Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Supply of reagent - calcium hydroxide

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167597
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€31,188
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,119 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of reagent - calcium hydroxide

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for calcium hydroxide supply presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating consistent quality, reliable delivery, and competitive pricing, leveraging the lack of specific technical or financial requirements to outmaneuver less prepared competitors. Proactive engagement and clear communication will be key.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable Supply Chain Excellence: Guaranteeing consistent, on-time delivery of high-quality calcium hydroxide to meet Rīgas ūdens' operational demands throughout the 36-month contract.

Cost-Effective Partnership: Offering competitive pricing without compromising on product quality or service reliability.

Unwavering Commitment to Quality: Ensuring the calcium hydroxide supplied meets all necessary purity and specification standards for water treatment applications.

Key Opportunities
Lack of detailed technical and financial requirements allows for differentiation through superior proposal clarity and demonstrated capability.
The open competition format suggests a need for a straightforward, well-presented bid that clearly addresses the core need.
Opportunity to establish a long-term relationship with a key public utility.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely to the authority's priorities.

Focus on addressing all explicit requirements thoroughly and present a comprehensive proposal that implicitly covers likely evaluation factors such as price, quality, and delivery reliability. Assume a balanced weighting across these areas.

Potential for a highly competitive market due to the essential nature of the product and the lack of explicit barriers to entry.

Conduct thorough market research to identify potential competitors and their likely strengths. Focus on clear differentiation through service, quality assurance, and a compelling value proposition.

Unspecified mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements mean bidders must proactively demonstrate compliance to avoid disqualification.

Carefully review the 'Atklāta konkursa nolikums' (Open Tender Regulations) for any general clauses or implied requirements related to legal standing, financial health, and ethical conduct. Ensure all standard compliance documentation is readily available and accurate.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A chemical supplier with a proven track record in delivering industrial reagents, specifically calcium hydroxide, to public sector entities. The ideal bidder possesses robust quality control processes, efficient logistics capabilities within Latvia (LV006), and a strong understanding of the operational needs of water treatment facilities. They should also be financially stable and capable of fulfilling a 36-month contract.
Key Requirements
Qualification, technical, and financial proposal submissions
Supply of reagent calcium hydroxide
36-month contract duration
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience with similar public sector water treatment clients.
A robust quality assurance plan for calcium hydroxide production and testing.
A clear and efficient logistics plan tailored to the Riga region.
Proactive communication and responsiveness throughout the tender process.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or supporting local supply chains where feasible, framing it as a contribution to the Riga community's economic well-being.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer a competitive price that reflects market value while ensuring profitability. Benchmark against known market rates for industrial-grade calcium hydroxide. Consider tiered pricing or volume discounts if applicable.

Quality

Provide detailed specifications of the calcium hydroxide offered, including purity levels, particle size, and any relevant certifications (e.g., ISO). Include a clear quality control process description.

Delivery Reliability

Outline a detailed logistics and delivery plan, including lead times, order fulfillment process, and contingency plans for potential disruptions. Highlight experience in timely deliveries.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Review Tender Regulations
CriticalMed effort

Despite the lack of explicitly detailed requirements, meticulously examine the 'Atklāta konkursa nolikums' (Document 2) for any general clauses, implied standards, or standard exclusion/eligibility criteria that must be met. Ensure all necessary legal, financial, and operational documentation is prepared.

Ensures compliance and avoids disqualification.
Assume Balanced Evaluation Criteria
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a balanced weighting between Price, Quality, and Delivery Reliability. Structure the proposal to excel in all these areas, providing clear evidence of capability and competitive advantage.

Maximizes scoring potential across all likely evaluation factors.
Highlight Quality Assurance Processes
HighMed effort

Detail your company's quality control measures from raw material sourcing to final product testing. Provide evidence of adherence to relevant standards (e.g., EN standards for chemical products if applicable) to build trust in product consistency.

Establishes credibility and differentiates from less quality-focused competitors.
Develop a Robust Logistics Plan
HighMed effort

Create a detailed plan for the 36-month supply, including delivery schedules, order processing, inventory management, and contingency measures for any supply chain disruptions. Emphasize proximity and efficiency within the LV006 region.

Demonstrates reliability and operational capability.
Proactive Clarification Requests
MediumLow effort

If any aspect of the tender documentation remains ambiguous, especially regarding implied requirements or the scope of 'reagent calcium hydroxide', submit formal clarification requests to SIA 'Rīgas ūdens' well before the deadline.

Reduces risk of misinterpretation and ensures bid alignment with authority expectations.
Consider Local Impact Statement
LowLow effort

Even without explicit social value requirements, a brief statement on how the company contributes to the local economy (e.g., local sourcing, employment) can be a subtle positive differentiator.

Adds a positive, albeit minor, element to the bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and quality-assured supplier, emphasizing a proven track record and robust operational processes. Highlight competitive pricing as a secondary but significant benefit, ensuring it does not appear to compromise quality or reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Qualification, technical, and financial proposal submissions are required.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements are detailed in the provided text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167597_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318050632.pdf -- 96.9 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of calcium hydroxide, including qualification, technical, and financial proposal submissions, as well as evaluation criteria.

Atklāta konkursa nolikumsPDF
Nolikums_2026_58.pdf -- 679.4 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the supply of calcium hydroxide by SIA "Rīgas ūdens".

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition procurement for the supply of reagent calcium hydroxide by Rīgas ūdens SIA.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for calcium hydroxide supply by SIA 'Rīgas ūdens' is generally well-structured, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting clarity and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of regulatory compliance within the provided text, though implied by the open procedure.

Clarity80/100

The core requirement for calcium hydroxide supply is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/technical/financial requirements within the provided text reduces overall clarity. The existence of attached documents is noted, but their content is not fully accessible.

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the provided text
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the provided text, necessitating access to attached documents.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing detailed exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in the provided text
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates potential barriers for some bidders, and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria makes it difficult to assess the objectivity of the selection process.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential manual component or a misunderstanding of the system. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided.

No e-submission (flagged, but e-procurement is mentioned)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes or suspensions are reported. Dates appear logical. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Open competition procedure
Use of e-procurement
Clear title and reference number
Specified contract duration

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detailed requirements in provided text

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and open access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
3. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline