Skip to main content
Tenders

Plungė district municipality, Šateikiai eldership, Šateikiai village, Palūščių-Burbaičiai village, ditch GR.3 and its existing

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
ID
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Telsiai County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
7 months
Location
Telsiai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

According to the prepared technical work project "Plungė district municipality, Šateikiai eldership, Šateikiai village, Palūščių-Burbaičiai village, ditch GR.3 and its existing
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
2 priedas PASIŪLYMO Forma.DOCX

This document is a bid form for the procurement of renovation works for drainage structures in Palūščių-Burbaičių village, Šateikiai municipality, Plungė district.

Sutarties projektasDOC
3 priedas_sutarties_projektas.docx

This document contains a draft contract for the repair of a ditch and drainage structures in Palūščių and Burbaičiai villages, Plungė district, based on a prepared technical project.

Darbų kiekių žiniaraštisDOC
4 priedas _DARBŲ__KIEKIŲ__ŽINIARAŠTIS.docx

No content extracted

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
PIRKIMO_SALYGOS_(MVP_SA).docx

This document contains the tender conditions for the low-value procurement of repair works for a drainage ditch and related structures in Plungė district, Lithuania.

Techninis darbo projektasPDF
1 priedas_24_369-TDP-BD.MS_Šateikiai_griovių_...

This document contains the technical working project for the repair of ditch Gr.-3 and its associated melioration structures in Plungė district, Lithuania.

NoticePDF
Notice_7021729.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the repair of a ditch and drainage structures in Plungė, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7021729_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for the tender.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for melioration works in Plungė region is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined procedure. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. The deadline, while potentially short, is stated. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the missing reveal date for submissions.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the technical project is provided. The tender structure and offer forms are documented. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and attached documents. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, suggesting they might be within the attached documents but not explicitly detailed here.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in AI extraction
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. The lack of disclosed value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be perceived as minor drawbacks, but there are no overt signs of tailoring to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a clear contract start date reduce its practicality. The submission deadline might be tight given the scope.

No explicit financing information
No clear contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The status is active, and no disputes are indicated. Dates are logically presented, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded. This area is underdeveloped.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical documentation provided
Open procedure with e-procurement
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Undisclosed estimated value
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline