Skip to main content
Tenders

Mobile workstation equipment (ILK) (11922)

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7016620
Value
€9,917
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Tender Opening

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€9,917
Duration
5 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€195,073
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
715 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Mobile workstation equipment (ILK)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

PD SPS 11922.docDOC
PD SPS 11922.doc -- 273.5 KB

No content extracted

BPS priedai 1_2.docxDOC
BPS priedai 1_2.docx -- 22.0 KB

No content extracted

PD BPS.docxDOC
PD BPS.docx -- 90.1 KB

No content extracted

SPS 1 priedas Technine specifikacija.docxDOC
SPS 1 priedas Technine specifikacija.docx -- 36.2 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 priedas Sutarties projektas 11922.docxDOC
SPS 2 priedas Sutarties projektas 11922.docx -- 201.9 KB

No content extracted

SPS 4 priedas Pasiulymo forma.docxDOC
SPS 4 priedas Pasiulymo forma.docx -- 22.5 KB

No content extracted

SPS 5 priedas_Nacionalinio saugumo atitikties deklaracija.docxDOC
SPS 5 priedas_Nacionalinio saugumo atitikties... -- 15.4 KB

No content extracted

SPS 6 priedas_Informacija apie tiekeja.docxDOC
SPS 6 priedas_Informacija apie tiekeja.docx -- 15.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7016620.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of mobile workstation equipment (ILK) by Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7016620_1.xml

This document contains the structure of a tender for mobile workstation equipment, specifying it's an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation and a mandatory file submission.

SPS 3 priedas EBVPD.zipZIP
SPS 3 priedas EBVPD.zip -- 83.8 KB

This document contains declarations required from bidders regarding responsible persons and sanctions related to Russian involvement, as part of a tender for mobile workstation equipment.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for mobile workstation equipment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a proper CPV code and EU funding indication. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. The procedure type (Open) is correctly identified.

Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are present. A good number of documents are attached, covering technical specifications and contract drafts. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and potential missing details in some document summaries could be improved.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with the value disclosed and a clear procedure. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect for accessibility.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed, and the 'No e-submission' flag suggests potential manual steps. The contract duration is short, and financing information is not explicitly detailed, which could affect practical implementation.

No e-submission specified
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are consistently populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good internal consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria, which are becoming increasingly important in public procurement. It is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain standards, but specific sustainability goals are absent.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and EU funding indication
Disclosed estimated value
Good number of supporting documents provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detail on e-submission process
Absence of sustainability and innovation criteria

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide specific instructions or a platform link for e-submission.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline