Skip to main content
Tenders

Foundations for lighting and traffic light poles

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7013447
Value
€80,000
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€80,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€266,129
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
95%
1,045 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Foundations for lighting and traffic light poles
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

1 priedas pasiulymo forma.docxDOC
1 priedas pasiulymo forma.docx -- 35.5 KB

No content extracted

2 priedas techninė specifikacija.docxDOC
2 priedas techninė specifikacija.docx -- 26.1 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas EBVPD kvalifikaciniai.docxDOC
3 priedas EBVPD kvalifikaciniai.docx -- 33.5 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas EBVPD.docxDOC
4 priedas EBVPD.docx -- 12.0 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas sutarties projektas.docxDOC
5 priedas sutarties projektas.docx -- 58.3 KB

No content extracted

6 priedas pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai ir jų vertinimo tvarka.docxDOC
6 priedas pasiūlymų vertinimo kriterijai ir ... -- 30.4 KB

No content extracted

Konkurso sąlygos (Pamatai).docxDOC
Konkurso sąlygos (Pamatai).docx -- 101.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7013447.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the supply of concrete products for lighting and traffic light supports in Klaipėda, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7013447_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for lighting and traffic light support foundations.

4 priedas.zipZIP
4 priedas.zip -- 79.3 KB

This document contains the contract draft for the purchase of foundations for lighting and traffic light supports, along with evaluation criteria for bids.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lighting and traffic light support foundations is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has some practical limitations regarding submission.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the value is disclosed. No disputes are noted. The 'Open' procedure code is standard for EU-funded tenders.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are concise and understandable. Key information such as estimated value, contract duration, and submission deadline are present. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the provided information reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. Multiple documents are attached, indicating a comprehensive set of tender documents. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the absence of a reveal date for opening results are noted omissions.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with full document access and disclosed value. Criteria are stated to be objective, and the use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. No requirements seem tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed, and the absence of a direct document URL for the tender package is a drawback. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.

No e-submission mechanism detailed
No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Proper CPV code and EU funding noted
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration
E-procurement mentioned
Multiple tender documents available

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed e-submission process
No specific sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide a direct URL for accessing all tender documents and clarify the e-submission process.
3. Consider incorporating specific green or social procurement objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline