Skip to main content
Tenders

Medical equipment. Duodenoscope

Open
Deadline
7 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7012424
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Tender Opening

April 03, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Medical equipment. Duodenoscope
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

6DOC
Bendrieji reikalavimai MĮ.docx

This document contains technical specifications and general requirements for the procurement of medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope, outlining necessary documentation, quality standards, and environmental considerations for bidders.

1DOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains definitions and general provisions for a public procurement tender for medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope.

7DOC
Konkurso sąlygos.docx

This document contains tender specifications for the procurement of a duodenoscope by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė, outlining technical requirements, submission procedures, and bidder qualifications.

3DOC
projektas sutartis.docx

This document contains the draft contract for the procurement of medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope, outlining general and special conditions, definitions, and the subject of the contract.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 73.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7012424.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of a duodenoscope medical device by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with corrupted data and an ESPD request in PDF format, likely related to a tender for medical equipment (duodenoscopes).

4XLS
Pasiulymo_forma.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for the procurement of medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope, for Klaipėda University Hospital.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7012424_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender for medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope, with an open procedure and lowest price evaluation.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 99.0 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning medical equipment, specifically a duodenoscope.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a duodenoscope is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial disclosure, impacting its overall fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of preparing a bid. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clear.

Submission deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, specifying the item (duodenoscope) and the procuring organization. Key documents like the contract notice, proposal form, and draft contract are available. However, evaluation criteria are not specified, which reduces clarity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The number of documents is high, but their content analysis is limited for some.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. All documents are accessible, and the use of e-procurement is noted. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not fully understand the scope or how their bids will be assessed against objective measures.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. A contract duration is specified. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and financing information reduces practicality. The availability of a README.txt with corrupted data is also a minor practical issue.

No e-submission (implied by 'E-Procurement' characteristic but not explicitly stated as a requirement)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical, with an opening date following the submission deadline. The 'active' status is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Proper CPV code provided
Open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Multiple relevant documents available
E-Procurement characteristic

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potentially short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Review and potentially extend the submission deadline if deemed too short.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline