Skip to main content
Tenders

Video equipment (MVP - announced survey)

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7011982
Value
€55,500
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€55,500
Duration
3 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€596,380
Avg. Bids
3.2
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
99%
456 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Video equipment (MVP - announced survey)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Tiekėjo deklaracijaDOC
4 priedas. Tiekėjo deklaracija+.docx

This document is a supplier's declaration confirming that the offered video equipment meets environmental criteria regarding durability and repairability, including provisions for spare parts, warranty, and material quality.

Pirkimo dokumentaiDOC
Pirkimo dokumentai vaizdo įranga +.docx

This document contains the tender conditions for the procurement of video equipment by VŠĮ Karaliaus Mindaugo profesinio mokymo centras.

NoticePDF
Notice_7011982.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of video equipment by VŠĮ Karaliaus Mindaugo profesinio mokymo centras in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 55,500 EUR.

Techninė specifikacijaXLS
Priedas nr. 1-1. Technine specifikacija Vaizd...

This document contains the technical specifications and price offer for video equipment in Excel format.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_7011982_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure for video equipment, requiring the submission of a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for video equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed sustainability considerations. The submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported. The procedure is open, indicating regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like technical specifications and tender conditions are provided. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Five tender documents are attached, covering essential aspects. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the AI-extracted section suggests these might be detailed solely within the attached documents, potentially impacting initial review.

AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the AI-extracted information does not confirm e-submission as a mandatory feature, and a contract start date is not explicitly stated. The short contract duration of 3 months might also impact practicality for some suppliers.

E-submission not explicitly confirmed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions environmental criteria regarding durability and repairability in the supplier's declaration, indicating some consideration for sustainability. However, there are no explicit green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation focus mentioned.

No explicit green procurement policy
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and EU directive adherence
Comprehensive set of attached tender documents
Use of e-procurement

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline
Limited explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Consider extending the submission deadline to allow for more thorough preparation.
3. Elaborate on sustainability and innovation requirements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline