Skip to main content
Tenders

Transport communications, other purpose engineering structures and utility networks, in Gargždai quarter

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7010751
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Transport communications, other purpose engineering structures and utility networks, in Gargždai quarter
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygosDOC
26 03 18 _ Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains general terms and conditions for a public procurement process for infrastructure development in Gargždai, outlining definitions, general provisions, and the structure of procurement documents.

Pirkimo specialiosios sąlygosDOC
26 03 18 _ Pirkimo specialiosios salygos.docx

This document contains the special conditions for a procurement process concerning the construction of communication, engineering structures, and networks in Gargždai, outlining general information, procurement object, supplier meetings, exclusion grounds, qualification requirements, national security aspects, and specific requirements for proposal preparation and submission.

Sutarties projektasDOC
8 priedas_Pirkimo sutarties projektas_2026 03...

This document contains the draft of a construction contract (Rangos sutartis) outlining the terms and definitions for a project involving engineering structures and networks in Gargždai.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.7 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7010751.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for road repair works in Gargždai, Lithuania, by the Klaipėda District Municipality Administration.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request file in XML format, likely related to a tender for infrastructure and engineering networks in Gargždai.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 103.1 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender related to infrastructure in Gargždai.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for infrastructure works in Gargždai is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard e-procurement process. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which is a regulatory requirement for transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, reference, and description of the works. Key documents like general and special conditions, technical specifications, and a draft contract are available. The requirements are generally documented, although evaluation criteria are absent.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, contact person, contract duration, and tender validity period. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. All necessary documents appear to be accessible. The criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned as AI-extracted requirements, suggesting they are present in the full documentation. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. A contract duration of 36 months is specified. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention 'E-submission' but the 'CHECKS' section notes 'No e-submission', creating ambiguity. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission capability
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active', and no disputes are reported. Dates are logically presented. The absence of a 'reveal date' is noted but does not impact core data consistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear documentation (general/special conditions, technical specs, contract draft)
Standard e-procurement process
Proper CPV code and EU procurement type
Active status with no reported disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria to ensure a fair and objective selection process.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline