Security of Detained and Confiscated Vehicles in Vilnius City or District

This tender for vehicle security services in Vilnius is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and specific sustainability considerations.

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clearly defined as 'OPEN'.

The tender title and description are clear. Mandatory requirements like exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are listed. However, the specific evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. Eight tender documents are available, covering terms and conditions, clarifications, and ESPD requests. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date for opening results could be considered a completeness gap.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The estimated value is disclosed. The use of e-procurement and the ESPD request promotes fairness. No specific company tailoring is apparent. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for bidders.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission. A contract duration of 37 months is specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks section contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating ambiguity. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated. The status is 'active'. No suspensions or disputes are reported. Dates are logically presented.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.