Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Professional hall sound system and accessories

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
7006534
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Tender Opening

April 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€271,089
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
558 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Professional hall sound system and its equipment.
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for professional hall sound systems presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating technical expertise, offering competitive pricing, and proactively addressing the lack of specified evaluation criteria by assuming a strong emphasis on technical merit and value for money.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable, High-Quality Professional Sound Solutions Tailored for the Lithuanian Military Academy.

Optimal Value for Money through Expert System Design and Competitive Pricing.

Seamless Integration and Support for Enhanced Operational Effectiveness.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows bidders to define their value proposition.
The tender is open, suggesting a broad market but potentially less intense competition if niche expertise is demonstrated.
The duration of 12 months allows for a focus on a well-defined project scope.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria creates uncertainty in bid weighting and focus.

Assume a strong emphasis on technical merit and best value for money. Clearly articulate the technical superiority of proposed solutions and provide a detailed cost breakdown demonstrating value.

The corrupted ESPD request file (DOCUMENT 3) may indicate potential administrative issues or require proactive clarification.

Immediately seek clarification from the Contracting Authority regarding the corrupted ESPD file and any implications for submission. Ensure all ESPD requirements are met accurately and completely.

No explicit mention of Green or Social aspects may lead bidders to overlook these areas, creating an opportunity for differentiation.

While not mandated, consider incorporating subtle sustainability elements in equipment choices (e.g., energy efficiency) or offering training to academy staff, which can be presented as added value.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A supplier with a proven track record in providing and installing professional audio equipment for institutional or public sector clients, possessing strong technical knowledge of sound systems, and capable of delivering high-quality solutions within budget and on time. Experience with military or educational institutions would be a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Provision of professional sound system and accessories for a hall.
Compliance with mandatory exclusion grounds.
Submission of a proposal using the provided 'Pasiulymo forma'.
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) completion.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated understanding of the specific acoustic needs of a military academy hall (e.g., for lectures, ceremonies, training).
Proactive and clear communication regarding the ESPD and any ambiguities in the tender documents.
A highly detailed technical proposal that goes beyond minimum requirements, showcasing expertise in sound system design, installation, and commissioning.
Competitive pricing that reflects value for money without compromising quality.
Social Value Opportunities
Offer a training session for Lithuanian Military Academy staff on the operation and basic maintenance of the new sound system, enhancing in-house capability and knowledge transfer.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Solution & System DesignN/A (assumed high)

Develop a comprehensive technical proposal that details the proposed sound system, including specific equipment models, their specifications, and how they meet the requirements for a professional hall. Emphasize system integration, ease of use, and reliability. Provide detailed schematics and installation plans.

Price/Value for MoneyN/A (assumed high)

Provide a clear, itemized pricing structure. Justify the proposed costs by highlighting the quality of equipment, the expertise of the installation team, and the long-term value of the solution. Offer competitive pricing that reflects market rates for professional-grade equipment.

Compliance & DocumentationN/A (critical)

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed and documented. Complete the ESPD accurately and thoroughly. Adhere strictly to the 'Pasiulymo forma' and all submission instructions. Proactively seek clarification on any unclear requirements.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are meticulously reviewed and that supporting documentation is readily available to demonstrate compliance. This is a non-negotiable requirement.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Assume Technical Merit and Value for Money as Primary Evaluation Factors
CriticalHigh effort

Given the absence of specified criteria, structure the bid to strongly emphasize the technical superiority and innovative aspects of the proposed sound system, alongside a compelling justification for the price as representing excellent value for money.

Maximizes scoring potential in the absence of defined weights.
Proactive Clarification on ESPD and Tender Ambiguities
HighLow effort

Immediately contact the Contracting Authority to clarify the corrupted ESPD file and any other ambiguities in the tender documents. Document all communications.

Avoids submission errors and demonstrates engagement.
Develop a Detailed Technical Specification and System Design
HighHigh effort

Go beyond a simple list of equipment. Provide a detailed system design, including acoustic considerations for the hall, signal flow, integration capabilities, and proposed installation methodology. Specify reputable brands and models.

Demonstrates expertise and builds confidence.
Incorporate Staff Training as Added Value
MediumMed effort

Include a proposal for comprehensive training for the Lithuanian Military Academy staff on the operation and basic maintenance of the sound system. This adds value beyond the core requirement.

Enhances user satisfaction and long-term system usability.
Contingency Planning for Equipment Availability and Lead Times
HighMed effort

Research lead times for proposed equipment and identify potential alternative suppliers or models to mitigate risks of delays, especially given the 2026 deadline.

Ensures timely project completion.
Prepare a Robust Pricing Strategy
MediumMed effort

Develop a detailed cost breakdown that is competitive yet reflects the quality and professionalism of the proposed solution. Consider offering tiered options if feasible, though not explicitly requested.

Secures a competitive edge on price.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically competent and reliable solution provider, emphasizing a deep understanding of professional audio systems and their application in institutional settings. Highlight experience with similar projects and a commitment to delivering exceptional sound quality and user experience.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

13 documents available with AI summaries

SIŪLOMŲ PREKIŲ TECHNINIAI PARAMETRAI 2 priedo priedelisDOC
2 priedo priedelis Siūlomų prekių tech. par.d...

This document contains a form for bidders to specify the technical parameters of the proposed goods, confirming their compliance with the tender requirements.

Sutarties projektasDOC
3 priedas Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas...

This document contains the draft of a purchase and sale agreement, including general and special conditions, for the professional sound system and equipment for a hall.

Pasalinimo pagrindai kvalifikacijaDOC
4 priedas Pasalinimo pagrindai kvalifikacija ...

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion of bidders and qualification requirements, stating that only the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is initially required, with further documentation requested from the most economically advantageous bidder.

INFORMACIJA APIE TIEKĖJĄ 4 priedo 1 priedelisDOC
4 priedo 1 priedelis 128589.docx

This document contains a form for providing information about the supplier, including any subcontractors or manufacturers, for a tender related to professional hall sound reinforcement and equipment.

Nacionalinio saugumo deklaracijaDOC
7 priedas Nacionalinio saugumo deklaracija.do...

This document is a bidder's declaration confirming compliance with national security requirements, including restrictions on entities and origins from specific countries.

DEKLARACIJA DĖL ĮRANGOS ATITIKIMO APLINKOS APSAUGOS REIKALAVIMAMSDOC
8 priedas Dėl gaminio atitikimo min aplinkos...

This document is a declaration by the bidder confirming that all equipment for the hall's professional sound system, as specified in the tender offer, is suitable for reuse or recycling.

Pirkimo salygosDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos 12589.docx

This document contains the terms and conditions for an open international tender by the General Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy for professional hall sound systems and accessories.

Technine specifikacijaPDF
1 priedas Techninė specifikacija 12589.pdf

This document contains the technical specifications for professional hall sound reinforcement and its accessories, detailing requirements for new equipment, warranty, installation, and specific acoustic and amplification system components.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 66.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_7006534.pdf

This document is a tender notice from the General Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy for the professional sound system and equipment for a hall, with submissions due by April 28, 2026.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted ESPD request file for a tender concerning professional hall sound reinforcement and equipment.

Pasiulymo formaXLS
2 priedas Pasiūlymo forma 12589.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for the professional sound system and equipment for a hall, to be submitted to the General Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 75.8 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning professional sound system and equipment for a hall.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for professional hall sound reinforcement is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information. It benefits from being EU-funded and utilizing e-procurement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The main weakness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could impact the transparency of the legal process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed in a dedicated document. Requirements are documented, and conditions are outlined in the 'Pirkimo salygos' document. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves a gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. Key documents like technical specifications, proposal forms, and contract drafts are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents appear to be accessible, and the value, while not disclosed, is not classified, suggesting a standard process. The criteria for exclusion and qualification are outlined, and the use of ESPD is standard. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. A contract duration is specified. However, the tender documents do not explicitly mention e-submission as the sole method, and the contract start date is not provided. Financing information is also absent.

No explicit mention of e-submission as the sole method
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. The status is 'active', and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no specific requirements or explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications provided
EU Funded and E-Procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of required documents
Adherence to EU procurement directives

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability objectives if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline