Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Purchase of vehicles (SAK)

Open
Deadline
3 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6998805
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
10 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to acquire two vehicles (minibuses).
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for two minibuses presents a moderate competition opportunity. The winning strategy will focus on demonstrating unwavering compliance with mandatory requirements, optimizing for unstated evaluation criteria through a value-driven approach, and leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect for differentiation. A strong emphasis on reliability and lifecycle cost will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Sustainable Transport Solutions for Kėdainiai Municipality

Optimized Lifecycle Value Through Quality and Efficiency

Seamless Procurement Experience with Proven Expertise

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement for differentiation.
The absence of specified evaluation criteria allows for a value-based proposal that goes beyond minimum requirements.
The relatively small quantity (two vehicles) may attract bidders focused on niche markets or those looking to enter the public sector, potentially reducing direct competition from large fleet providers.
Key Challenges
Unspecified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to precisely tailor the bid for maximum scoring.

Develop a comprehensive proposal that addresses all likely evaluation factors such as price, technical specification, delivery timeline, warranty, after-sales support, and sustainability. Assume a balanced weighting and aim for excellence across all.

Potential for a high number of bidders due to the open procurement type and the relatively straightforward nature of the requirement (two minibuses).

Focus on clear, concise, and compliant documentation. Highlight unique selling propositions and ensure all mandatory requirements are met without ambiguity. Proactive engagement with the contracting authority (if permitted) to clarify any ambiguities in the tender documents.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established vehicle supplier with a proven track record in public sector procurement, particularly for specialized vehicles. The ideal bidder possesses strong technical expertise in minibus specifications, a robust supply chain for timely delivery, and a clear commitment to sustainability and lifecycle cost reduction. Experience with ESPD submissions is also essential.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements (including ESPD)
Green Procurement (as stated)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to lifecycle cost reduction through fuel efficiency, durability, and low maintenance requirements.
Proactive and comprehensive approach to 'Green Procurement' beyond minimum compliance, e.g., offering vehicles with higher emission standards or sustainable material options.
Exceptional warranty and after-sales support package tailored to public sector needs.
A clear and efficient delivery and handover plan, ensuring minimal disruption to the contracting authority's operations.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects' are not explicitly mentioned, a bidder could proactively suggest a commitment to local employment during any potential vehicle customization or maintenance phases, or offer training to the contracting authority's drivers on eco-driving techniques to further enhance sustainability.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Offer a competitive price that reflects the quality and lifecycle value. Avoid being the cheapest if it compromises quality or sustainability. Consider offering options for different trim levels or financing to provide flexibility.

Technical Specifications

Exceed minimum requirements where feasible, particularly in areas related to safety, comfort, and durability. Clearly articulate how the proposed vehicles meet and surpass the 'Specialised Vehicles' CPV code. Highlight fuel efficiency and low emissions.

Delivery Timeline

Provide a realistic and achievable delivery timeline. If possible, offer an earlier delivery option as a potential advantage.

Sustainability (Green Procurement)

Detail the environmental credentials of the proposed vehicles (e.g., Euro emission standards, fuel efficiency ratings, use of recycled materials). If possible, propose vehicles that are at the forefront of green technology within the minibus segment.

Warranty and After-Sales Support

Offer a comprehensive warranty and a robust after-sales support network, emphasizing rapid response times and availability of parts, which are critical for public sector operations.

Recommendations6
Thorough ESPD Compliance
CriticalMed effort

Ensure meticulous completion of the ESPD (both XML and PDF versions if applicable) with all required documentation attached. Any errors or omissions can lead to exclusion.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate disqualification.
Proactive 'Green Procurement' Strategy
HighMed effort

Go beyond basic compliance. Research and propose vehicles with superior fuel efficiency, lower emissions, or those manufactured using sustainable materials. Clearly articulate these benefits and their long-term cost savings for the municipality.

Provides a strong differentiator and aligns with the stated procurement objective.
Lifecycle Cost Analysis
HighMed effort

While price is important, present a compelling case for the total cost of ownership. Include detailed breakdowns of fuel consumption, maintenance costs, expected lifespan, and resale value. This demonstrates long-term value.

Positions the bid as a strategic investment rather than just a purchase.
Clarify Technical Specifications
MediumLow effort

If any technical specifications are ambiguous or could be interpreted in multiple ways, proactively seek clarification from the Kėdainiai District Municipality Administration before the submission deadline. This avoids potential misinterpretations.

Ensures the proposed vehicles precisely meet the contracting authority's needs and avoids technical non-compliance.
Optional Eco-Driving Training
LowLow effort

Offer optional eco-driving training for the municipality's drivers as a value-add. This further enhances the sustainability benefits and demonstrates a commitment to responsible vehicle operation.

Adds a tangible sustainability benefit and enhances the bidder's social responsibility image.
Robust Warranty and Support Plan
CriticalMed effort

Detail a comprehensive warranty package and a responsive after-sales service plan, including availability of spare parts and qualified technicians. This is crucial for public sector continuity.

Reduces perceived risk for the contracting authority and ensures operational reliability.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as offering superior lifecycle value and a proactive approach to sustainability, rather than solely focusing on the lowest initial price. Emphasize reliability and long-term operational efficiency. Highlight any certifications or awards related to environmental performance or vehicle quality.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

2 priedas Techninė specifikacijaDOC
2 priedas Techninė_specifikacija.docx

This document contains the technical specifications for the procurement of two minibuses.

3 priedas Pašalinimo pagrindaiDOC
3 priedas SAK pašalinimo pagrindai.docx

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion from a procurement procedure, specifying that only the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) is required initially, with further documentation requested from the most economically advantageous bidder.

6 priedas Pasiūlymo formaDOC
6_priedas_pasiulymo_forma.docx

This document contains a bid form template for a tender to purchase two minibuses, requiring the bidder to provide information about themselves, subcontractors, and the proposed price.

8 priedas Sutarties bendrosios sąlygosDOC
8_Priedas_Sutarties_bendrosios_sąlygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, document hierarchy, and the subject of the contract.

8 priedas Sutarties specialiosios sąlygosDOC
8 priedas Sutarties_specialiosios_sąlygos.doc...

This document contains the special conditions for the purchase and sale agreement for two minibuses.

Pirkimo bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios salygos.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process, including definitions and procedural rules for the acquisition of two minibuses.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6998805.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of two minibuses by the Kėdainiai District Municipality Administration in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in PDF format, likely related to a tender for purchasing two minibuses.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.5 KB

This document is a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD) for a tender concerning the acquisition of two minibuses.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the procurement of two minibuses is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined procedure. However, it lacks transparency regarding the estimated value and specific evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. The procedure is open, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure, though the submission deadline is relatively short.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement (two minibuses) is clear. Key documents like the technical specification and offer form are available. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. All required documents seem to be attached, with 12 total documents available.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of ESPD is standard. While the value is not disclosed, the process itself appears objective. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair approach.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission, which is positive. However, the 'Checks' section notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (marked as E-Procurement but noted as 'No e-submission')
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with an opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and tender title
Comprehensive set of tender documents available
Open procedure promoting competition
Adherence to EU procurement directives

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Clarify and confirm the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline