Skip to main content
Tenders

Simple repair works of the shelter located at Paupio g. 10, Rietavas, with preparation of the scope of works

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6990053
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Telsiai County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Telsiai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The properties and quantities of the works to be purchased are specified in the technical specification of the works. Building for scientific purposes
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No information]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Preparation of the work description
--Simple repair works for the canopy at Paupio g. 10, Rietave, for a building of scientific purpose
--The characteristics and quantities of the purchased works are provided in the technical specification of the works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygų 1 priedas Pasiūlymo formaDOC
Pirkimo sąlygų 1 priedas Pasiūlymo forma.docx

This document is a tender offer form for renovation works, requiring bidder details, pricing, and confirmation of understanding tender requirements.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Priedangos pap remonto darbai KS.docx

This document contains the terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for simple renovation works and preparation of a work description for a shelter located in Rietavas.

NoticePDF
Notice_6990053.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for renovation works, including the preparation of a work description, to install shelters in the basement of a science building in Rietavas, Lithuania.

Rietavas_Paupio g. 10_darželis.pdfPDF
Rietavas_Paupio g. 10_darželis.pdf -- 1.1 MB

No content extracted

Rietavo lopšelio-darželio rūsys.pdfPDF
Rietavo lopšelio-darželio rūsys.pdf -- 131.5 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for simple repair works and preparation of a work description presents a generally well-structured documentation with clear technical specifications, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and financial details.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with most regulatory requirements, utilizing the open procedure as per EU directives. The CPV code is appropriately specified. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern, and the short submission deadline might be problematic in some jurisdictions.

Missing evaluation criteria could be a compliance issue.
Submission deadline may be too short.
Clarity80/100

The technical requirements, including the scope of works and quantities, are stated to be detailed in the technical specification, which is a positive indicator. The description of the works is reasonably clear. However, the explicit mention of 'no specific requirements listed' for several crucial sections in the AI-extracted requirements suggests potential for ambiguity in the full documentation.

AI-extracted requirements indicate potential gaps in explicit listing of mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. Key documents like the technical specification, offer form, and tender conditions are available. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts the overall completeness from a financial perspective.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, indicating a move towards fair and transparent processes. The availability of a substantial number of documents suggests good access to information. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The disclosure of the contract duration is positive.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and includes e-procurement characteristics. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate 'No e-submission' in the 'ISSUES/FLAGS' section, which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and raises practical concerns. The financing information and contract start date are not explicitly detailed.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag.
Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logically ordered, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not flagged as EU funded, which might limit specific sustainability mandates. This indicates a neutral to low focus on sustainability criteria.

No specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are mentioned.

Strengths

Clear technical specification and scope of works.
E-procurement implementation.
Comprehensive set of attached tender documents.
Well-defined CPV code.

Concerns

Lack of disclosed estimated value.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission.
Short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline