Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of mineral-asphalt mixture based on liquefied asphalt for the needs of the Provincial Road Administration in Zielona Góra – Zielona Góra Provincial Road District

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00169425/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubuskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Lubuskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€546,546
Avg. Bids
0.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
5,802 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of mineral-asphalt mixture based on liquefied asphalt for the needs of the Provincial Road Administration in Zielona Góra – Zielona Góra Provincial Road District

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Delivery of mineral-asphalt mixture based on liquefied asphalt.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de89a5-9bc4-1900-056e-e50001aaab56.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the supply of mineral-asphalt mixture for the Provincial Road Administration in Zielona Góra, Poland, with offers to be submitted electronically.

SWZ 23.pdfPDF
SWZ 23.pdf

This document contains the specifications for a public tender for the supply of mineral-asphalt mixture for the Provincial Road Administration in Zielona Góra.

załączniki do SWZ- edytowalne.docxDOC
załączniki do SWZ- edytowalne.docx

This document contains several annexes to the tender offer form, including a statement of non-exclusion, a commitment to provide resources, and a price form, all required for the supply of mineral-asphalt mixture.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for mineral-asphalt mixture is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness for a 3-month contract is debatable. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type is 'None', which is unusual and could imply a simplified or direct award process, but without further information, it's difficult to assess fully. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the presence of standard tender elements.

Procedure type 'None' is unusual and lacks clarity on the specific legal framework applied.
Clarity80/100

The description of the required goods is clear, and the tender documents provide technical specifications. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their offers will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are attached, the lack of financial details and specific eligibility/submission requirements in the provided text limits completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing detailed eligibility and submission requirements in the provided text.
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which promotes fairness. The division into parts is not applicable here as it's a single supply. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not fully understand the scope or how they will be judged. However, there are no overt indications of tailored requirements for specific companies.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive aspect for practical submission. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and creates ambiguity. The contract duration of 3 months is short, and financing information is not provided.

Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue.
Financing information not disclosed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, CPV code, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract duration is specified. The only inconsistency is the potential conflict between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission'.

Potential conflict between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue.
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria mentioned.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear CPV code provided.
E-Procurement characteristic noted.
Documents are available and analyzed.
Basic tender information is present.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Lack of sustainability focus (green, social, innovation).
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects (e.g., environmental impact, social responsibility) into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline