Skip to main content
Tenders

Microscope (ILK) (11910)

Open
Deadline
33 days left
April 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6982471
Value
€8,500
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 29, 2026

Tender Opening

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€8,500
Duration
6 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€136,921
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,192 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Microscope (ILK) 1 pc. (details in Procurement Conditions)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in this category]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

(BPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
(BPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 90.7 KB

No content extracted

(BPS) priedai 1_2.docxDOC
(BPS) priedai 1_2.docx -- 22.2 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.docxDOC
SPS 2 Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projektas.doc... -- 157.0 KB

No content extracted

(SPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docxDOC
(SPS) Pirkimo sąlygos.docx -- 105.0 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6982471.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of one microscope (ILK) by VšĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos in Lithuania, with a deadline for submission on April 29, 2026.

SPS 1 Pasiūlymas_Techninė specifikacija.xlsxXLS
SPS 1 Pasiūlymas_Techninė specifikacija.xlsx -- 52.9 KB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6982471_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a tender submission, specifically for a microscope, indicating that a complete tender file is mandatory for evaluation.

SPS 3 EBVPD.zipZIP
SPS 3 EBVPD.zip -- 79.2 KB

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open international tender by VŠĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos for the procurement of goods, services, or works, including specific requirements and appendices.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a microscope is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and provides a clear procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. There are no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure.

Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear, but the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section is notably empty. Key details such as evaluation criteria are missing, requiring bidders to infer them from attached documents.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit requirements in the AI-extracted section and the reliance on attached documents for crucial details reduce overall completeness.

Lack of explicit requirements in AI-extracted section
Reliance on attached documents for critical details
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. There are no immediately apparent tailored requirements for specific companies. E-procurement is indicated.

Practicality65/100

While e-procurement is mentioned, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not detailed. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is short.

Lack of specific e-submission details
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded' but does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Appropriate CPV code provided
Open procedure with EU funding
Documents are available

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed technical requirements
Unclear e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly within the tender notice or accessible documents.
2. Provide more detailed technical specifications or a clear link to them.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline