Skip to main content
Tenders

Medical devices. Reusable suction tubes

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6978702
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Medical devices. Reusable suction tubes
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

1DOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains definitions of terms and abbreviations used in a tender for medical devices, specifically reusable suction tubes, and outlines general provisions for the procurement process.

4DOC
Supaprastintas SPECIALIOSIOS sąlygos.docx

This document contains tender specifications for the procurement of reusable suction tubes by Klaipėda University Hospital, outlining technical requirements, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria.

5DOC
Viešojo_pirkimo-pardavimo_sutarties_projektas...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy for medical supplies.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 73.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6978702.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of reusable suction tubes for medical use by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains ESPD request files in XML and PDF formats, related to a tender for reusable suction tubes for medical devices.

3XLS
Pasiulymo_forma.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for the procurement of reusable medical suction tubes of various sizes for Klaipėda University Hospital.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6978702_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for medical devices.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 99.0 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in relation to a tender for reusable medical suction catheters.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reusable suction tubes is generally well-structured with available documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial aspects, impacting its overall clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. While deadlines are present, the submission deadline might be considered short given the document count. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clear.

Clarity80/100

The description of the goods is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The AI-extracted requirements section is notably empty.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including contract duration and CPV. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a key piece of information for bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are entirely missing, suggesting a lack of detailed specification in that area.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing AI-extracted requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. All documents appear to be accessible, and the use of e-procurement is positive. The lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, but there are no explicit indications of tailoring to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'Procurement Characteristics'. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is also absent.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The 'Issues' section mentions a 'Missing reveal date', which is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Proper CPV code provided
E-procurement characteristic noted
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific AI-extracted requirements
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency with e-procurement characteristics.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline