Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Territory of Šeškinė slopes geomorphological reserve with approaches between Geležinio Vilko g. and Ukmergės

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6978129
Value
€10,354,222
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Tender Opening

April 23, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€10,354,222
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Territory of Šeškinė slopes geomorphological reserve with approaches between Geležinio Vilko g. and Ukmergės g.,
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the Šeškinė slopes geomorphological reserve requires a strong technical and environmental focus. Bidders must demonstrate a deep understanding of the technical project and a commitment to green procurement principles. Leveraging past experience in similar sensitive ecological areas and showcasing innovative, sustainable construction methods will be crucial for differentiation.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in ecological construction and sensitive area management.

Commitment to sustainable practices and green procurement.

Proven track record of delivering complex civil engineering projects on time and within budget.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 'Green Procurement' requirement to showcase sustainable construction methods and materials.
Deep dive into the 'Techninis projektas' to identify opportunities for value engineering or innovative solutions that align with the reserve's ecological goals.
The absence of specified evaluation criteria suggests a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and demonstrating technical competence through the detailed technical project.
The long duration (36 months) allows for phased approaches and potential for demonstrating long-term environmental stewardship.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to prioritize bid elements and understand the weighting of different aspects.

Assume a strong emphasis on technical compliance, adherence to the technical project, and green procurement. Focus on meticulously fulfilling all stated requirements and providing comprehensive, well-documented evidence of capability and approach. Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority if possible.

The 'Techninis projektas' is likely to be complex and may require specialized ecological and engineering expertise to fully interpret and implement.

Assemble a dedicated team with expertise in geomorphology, ecological restoration, civil engineering, and environmental management. Engage specialist consultants if necessary to ensure a thorough understanding and a compliant, high-quality technical solution.

The absence of specific social and innovative aspects might lead to a more traditional, compliance-focused bid. Differentiation will be key.

Focus differentiation on the quality of the technical solution, the robustness of the green procurement strategy, and the proven experience in similar sensitive environments. Highlight any inherent social benefits of the project (e.g., improved public access, environmental education opportunities) even if not explicitly requested.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A civil engineering and construction firm with proven experience in environmentally sensitive site development, landscape restoration, and infrastructure works within protected natural areas. The ideal bidder will possess strong project management capabilities, a skilled workforce experienced in ecological construction, and a robust understanding of Lithuanian environmental regulations and green procurement standards.
Key Requirements
Adherence to the 'Techninis projektas' (Technical Project)
Compliance with Green Procurement principles
Demonstrated capability in civil engineering and construction works
Submission in the specified 'Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1' format
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in constructing within geomorphological reserves or similar protected natural areas.
Innovative and sustainable construction methodologies that minimize environmental impact and enhance ecological value.
A highly detailed and well-researched approach to the 'Techninis projektas', potentially including minor value-adding suggestions.
A clear and compelling strategy for meeting and exceeding green procurement requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to employing local labor where feasible, prioritizing individuals with relevant ecological or construction skills.
Implement a waste reduction and recycling program exceeding minimum requirements, with a focus on circular economy principles.
Develop a plan for site rehabilitation and post-construction ecological enhancement, potentially including planting native species or creating habitats.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Compliance with 'Techninis projektas'

Thoroughly analyze the technical project, ensuring every detail is addressed. Propose a construction methodology that is not only compliant but also demonstrates efficiency and minimal environmental disturbance. Use clear diagrams and explanations to illustrate the proposed solution.

Green Procurement Strategy

Detail specific materials, techniques, and waste management strategies that align with green procurement principles. Quantify environmental benefits where possible (e.g., reduced carbon footprint, water usage). Showcase any relevant certifications or past performance in green construction.

Overall Technical Capability and Experience

Provide robust evidence of past projects of similar scale and complexity, particularly those in environmentally sensitive areas. Highlight the expertise of the project team and any specialized skills relevant to the Šeškinė slopes.

Submission Format and Compliance

Strictly adhere to the 'Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1' format. Ensure all mandatory documents are included and correctly formatted. Double-check all submission requirements to avoid disqualification.

Recommendations6
Master the Technical Project
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an in-depth analysis of the 'Techninis projektas' (DOCUMENT 2). Identify all technical specifications, constraints, and objectives. Develop a detailed construction plan that meticulously addresses each aspect, highlighting any areas where innovative or more sustainable approaches can be implemented without compromising the core design.

Ensures full compliance and demonstrates technical prowess, a likely core evaluation factor.
Prioritize Green Procurement
CriticalHigh effort

Develop a comprehensive green procurement strategy that goes beyond minimum requirements. Detail specific sustainable materials, energy-efficient construction methods, waste management plans (including recycling and reuse), and strategies for minimizing environmental impact during construction. Quantify benefits where possible.

Maximizes scoring in the 'Green Procurement' aspect and differentiates the bid.
Showcase Ecological Sensitivity Expertise
HighMed effort

Highlight past experience in managing construction projects within protected natural areas, geomorphological reserves, or ecologically sensitive landscapes. Provide case studies or testimonials that demonstrate a proven ability to work harmoniously with the environment and minimize disruption.

Builds trust and credibility, positioning the bidder as the ideal partner for this specific project.
Strictly Adhere to Submission Format
CriticalMed effort

Ensure the bid is meticulously prepared and submitted strictly in accordance with the 'Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1' format (DOCUMENT 3). Pay close attention to all file naming conventions, data structures, and submission procedures to avoid automatic disqualification.

Essential for bid validity and avoids immediate rejection.
Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
HighMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a strong emphasis on technical compliance, adherence to the technical project, and green procurement. Structure the bid to clearly demonstrate excellence in these areas. If possible, seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding evaluation priorities.

Ensures the bid is comprehensive and addresses likely evaluation focus areas.
Propose Local Employment and Training
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to prioritizing local labor for the project, potentially offering training opportunities in specialized construction techniques or environmental management. This adds a positive social dimension even if not explicitly required.

Enhances the bid's social responsibility profile and can be a subtle differentiator.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most technically competent and environmentally responsible bidder, capable of delivering complex works in a sensitive ecological zone.
Emphasize a proactive and collaborative approach, demonstrating a willingness to work closely with the contracting authority to achieve the project's environmental and engineering goals.
Highlight a track record of successful project delivery within budget and schedule, coupled with a strong commitment to sustainability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Techninis projektasDOC
Techninis projektas.docx

This document contains the technical project for the Šeškinė slopes geomorphological reserve area, accessible via a provided link due to file size limitations.

NoticePDF
Notice_6978129.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for construction and civil engineering works for the Šeškinė slopes geomorphological reserve area and its approaches in Vilnius, Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6978129_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for the first round of an open procedure evaluating the lowest price.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for civil engineering works in Vilnius is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and EU funding indicated. However, it lacks detailed eligibility and technical requirements, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract value and duration. No disputes are reported. The main weakness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal aspect.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and estimated value are clear. The availability of a technical project document is noted. However, the absence of detailed eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No specific eligibility requirements detailed
No specific technical capability requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the critical absence of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing significantly impacts completeness.

Missing detailed exclusion grounds
Missing detailed eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of detailed requirements means criteria are not fully specified, potentially leading to subjective evaluation if not addressed. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the submission requirements are not fully detailed, and the 'Tender Structure XML' suggests a specific format without explicit guidance on the e-submission platform or process. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission details
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which is a positive characteristic. However, there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

EU Funded status
Clear basic information (title, value, duration)
E-Procurement enabled
Proper CPV code and EU directive adherence

Concerns

Missing detailed eligibility and technical requirements
Lack of specified evaluation criteria
Ambiguous submission process details

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline