Skip to main content
Tenders

Artificial intelligence program for Philips Incisive tomograph

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6974842
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€550,329
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
578 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Artificial intelligence program for Philips Incisive tomograph is being purchased
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

SAK_Pirkimo dok. bendros salygos.docxDOC
SAK_Pirkimo dok. bendros salygos.docx -- 52.1 KB

No content extracted

SAK_ specialiosios sąlygos ir priedai.docxDOC
SAK_ specialiosios sąlygos ir priedai.docx -- 186.9 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6974842.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of an artificial intelligence program for a Philips Incisive CT scanner by Raseiniai Hospital in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6974842_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a tender process, specifically for an AI program for a Philips Incisive tomograph, requiring a complete tender file submission.

espd-request.zipZIP
espd-request.zip -- 85.1 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process by VšĮ Raseinių ligoninė to acquire artificial intelligence software for a Philips Incisive CT scanner, emphasizing green procurement criteria and national security requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for AI software for a CT scanner is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial disclosure. The short contract duration and limited documentation content are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (Code: 2014/24/ES) and specifies an open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions and the lack of specified evaluation criteria are potential compliance issues.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the procurement's purpose: AI software for a Philips Incisive CT scanner. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) and the inability to extract content from some attached documents reduce overall clarity.

No detailed requirements provided (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial)
Content not extracted from some documents
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements sections are empty, indicating a lack of completeness in critical areas.

Estimated value not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements sections are empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria could potentially hinder fair competition.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the contract duration of only 3 months is very short for an AI software implementation, and financing information is not provided. The lack of explicit e-submission details beyond 'E-Procurement' is also a minor concern.

Contract duration is very short (3 months)
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date) are logical. The contract duration is specified.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. It is also not indicated if the tender is EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description of the procurement
Appropriate CPV code provided
Use of e-procurement
Open procedure type

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Very short contract duration (3 months)
Lack of detailed requirements in AI-extracted sections

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Re-evaluate the contract duration to ensure it is sufficient for the scope of work.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline