Skip to main content
Tenders

Fume hood

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6972028
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Panevezys County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Panevezys County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€69,654
Avg. Bids
3.6
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
1,750 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Fume hood (1 pc.) for the chemistry laboratory of Panevėžys J. Miltinis Gymnasium.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information available on mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo BSDOC
AK (supaprastintas) BS_traukos spinta.docx

This document outlines the terms and conditions for a public procurement process to acquire a fume hood for a chemistry classroom.

Pirkimo SSDOC
AK (supaprastintas) SS_traukos spinta.docx

This document contains the special conditions for a simplified open tender for the procurement of a fume hood for Panevėžys J. Miltinis Gymnasium's chemistry classroom.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 83.9 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6972028.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the procurement of one fume hood for the chemistry laboratory of Panevėžys J. Miltinis Gymnasium, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains ESPD request files in XML and PDF formats, likely related to a tender for a fume hood.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6972028_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for an open tender procedure for a fume hood, with the lowest price as the evaluation criterion, requiring a complete tender submission.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.5 KB

This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) in XML format, likely related to a tender for a fume hood.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a fume hood is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses the correct CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor oversight. The overall legal framework appears sound.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required item (fume hood) is clear, and the purpose is well-defined. Key documents like technical and general conditions are attached. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. While documents are attached, the lack of financial transparency affects completeness.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. Access to documents is implied through the provided list. The criteria for exclusion and eligibility are not explicitly detailed, which could be a point of concern, but no specific company tailoring is evident. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the absence of explicit information regarding e-submission mechanisms and the contract start date reduces practicality. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission mechanism specified
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and submission deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and classification
Open procedure for broad participation
EU funded status
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific e-submission details

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide specific instructions or links for e-submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline