Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Preparation of the technical work project for the group living house located at Kaštonų g. 7, Klaipėda and

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6967387
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
21 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Preparation of the technical work project for the group living house located at Kaštonų g. 7, Klaipėda and
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for the technical design of group living houses in Klaipėda presents a moderate competition opportunity. Success hinges on demonstrating strong technical capability, a clear understanding of green procurement principles, and a well-structured, compliant bid. While social and innovative aspects are not explicitly required, integrating them strategically can provide a competitive edge.

Key Winning Messages

Delivering sustainable and functional group living spaces through expert technical design.

A reliable partner committed to quality, efficiency, and environmental responsibility in public infrastructure projects.

Key Opportunities
Leverage 'Green Procurement' requirement to showcase sustainable design solutions.
Demonstrate strong project management capabilities for the 21-month duration.
Utilize the ESPD as a platform to clearly articulate capabilities and compliance.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy.

Focus on comprehensively addressing all stated requirements and proactively demonstrating best practices in technical design, sustainability, and project management. Assume a balanced evaluation across technical merit, compliance, and potentially price (if it becomes a factor).

No disclosed estimated value may indicate a tight budget or a need for highly competitive pricing.

Develop a cost-effective yet high-quality solution. Conduct thorough internal cost analysis to ensure profitability while remaining competitive. Highlight value-for-money aspects in the proposal.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An architecture and engineering firm with proven experience in designing public buildings, specifically residential or social housing projects. The ideal bidder will have a strong track record in Lithuania, a demonstrated commitment to sustainable design practices, and the capacity to manage a 21-month project lifecycle. Familiarity with Klaipėda's local regulations and building codes is a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Technical design of group living houses
European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) compliance
Adherence to Green Procurement principles
21-month project duration management
Submission of all required documents by the deadline
Key Discriminators
Proactive integration of advanced sustainable design features beyond minimum requirements.
Demonstrated experience with similar public housing projects in Lithuania, specifically Klaipėda.
A clear and compelling project execution plan that emphasizes efficiency, risk mitigation, and stakeholder engagement.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to sourcing local materials where feasible to support the local economy.
Proposed design that considers long-term community integration and accessibility for residents.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed examples of past projects, CVs of key personnel, and a clear methodology for technical design, ensuring it aligns with green procurement principles.

Compliance and Documentation

Ensure all ESPD sections are accurately completed and all supporting documents are meticulously prepared and submitted on time. Double-check all mandatory requirements.

Green Procurement Integration

Clearly articulate how sustainable materials, energy efficiency, and lifecycle considerations will be incorporated into the technical design. Reference relevant Lithuanian or EU green building standards.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Address ESPD Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Ensure all sections of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) are completed accurately and comprehensively. This is a fundamental compliance requirement.

Avoids immediate disqualification and demonstrates adherence to procurement procedures.
Proactively Integrate Green Procurement Principles
HighHigh effort

Since 'Green Procurement' is explicitly stated, go beyond minimum compliance. Detail specific sustainable design strategies, materials, and energy-efficient solutions that will be incorporated into the technical design. Reference relevant standards and best practices.

Demonstrates a commitment to sustainability, potentially differentiating the bid and aligning with the contracting authority's objectives.
Showcase Relevant Project Experience
HighMed effort

Highlight past experience in designing similar public or residential buildings, especially those with a social or community focus. Provide specific examples and quantifiable achievements.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the required technical design.
Develop a Robust Project Management Plan
HighMed effort

Outline a clear and realistic project execution plan for the 21-month duration, including timelines, resource allocation, risk management strategies, and communication protocols.

Assures the contracting authority of efficient project delivery and control.
Address Unspecified Evaluation Criteria
HighMed effort

Given the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, assume a balanced approach. Focus on excelling in all known requirements: technical capability, compliance, and green procurement. Prepare to justify the proposed price based on value and quality.

Maximizes chances of a favorable evaluation by covering all potential assessment areas.
Incorporate Local Economic Benefits
MediumLow effort

Suggest incorporating local sourcing of materials or labor where feasible within the design and construction phases (even if not explicitly required for the design phase itself, it shows forward-thinking).

Adds a layer of social responsibility and local community support, which can be a positive, albeit unweighted, factor.
Clarify Ambiguities (if possible)
MediumLow effort

If any aspects of the tender documents remain unclear, consider submitting a formal request for clarification to the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline.

Ensures a precise understanding of requirements, leading to a more accurate and compliant bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a comprehensive solution that not only meets but exceeds the technical and green procurement requirements, emphasizing long-term value and sustainability. Highlight a proactive approach to project management and a deep understanding of the local context in Klaipėda.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

1 priedas – Pasiūlymo forma;DOC
1priedas_Pasiulymas.docx

This document contains a bid form for the preparation of a technical working project and supervision services for group living houses in Klaipėda.

2 priedas – Ekonominio naudingumo vertinimo kriterijai;DOC
2priedas_ekonominio_naud._kriterijai_(Kastonu...

This document outlines the economic benefit assessment criteria for the technical design of group housing, specifying that primary personnel experience is a quality criterion where no clarification is allowed, and points will be awarded based on submitted information.

3 priedas – Paslaugų sutartis (projektas);DOC
3priedas_Sutartis_(projektas).docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a service purchase and sale agreement, outlining definitions, interpretation rules, and document hierarchy for the provision of services related to the technical design of group living houses.

4 priedas – Specialistų sąrašo forma;DOC
4priedas_Specialistu_sarasas_(del_18.1_p._kva...

This document contains a form for listing specialists responsible for contract execution and outlines rules for clarifying initial qualification data, emphasizing that new specialists cannot be substituted for those who do not meet requirements.

5 priedas – Statinio architektūros dalies projektų sąrašo forma;DOC
5priedas_Ek._naud._specialisto_projektu_saras...

This document contains a form for listing architectural projects of a building, to be submitted with a bid concerning the 'Main Personnel Experience' economic advantage criterion.

6 priedas – Deklaracijos dėl Tarybos reglamente (ES) 2022/576 nustatytų sąlygų n...DOC
6priedas_Deklaracija_del_Tarybos_Reglamento_(...

This document is a declaration form for bidders to confirm they are not subject to restrictions imposed by Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 concerning Russian influence.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Salygos_Kastonu_g._7_TDPPVP.docx

This document contains the terms of an open tender for the preparation of a technical working project and supervision services for group living houses in Klaipėda.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 85.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6967387.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the preparation of a technical working project and supervision services for group living houses in Klaipėda, Lithuania.

MetaduomenysPDF
Pirkimo_dokumentu_metaduomenys.pdf

This document contains metadata for tender number 63416, concerning the preparation of a technical design and project supervision for group living houses in Klaipėda.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains technical specifications for the preparation of a technical design project for group living houses.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 129.2 KB

This document contains a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD) for the preparation of a technical design for group living houses.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for technical design services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and financial transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. While deadlines are present, the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity implied by the number of documents. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed due to the EU directive code.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached forms and documents. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for economic benefit is a notable gap.

Missing evaluation criteria specified in the tender notice itself.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including contract duration and tender validity. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated Value not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. All documents appear to be accessible, and the criteria for specialists are outlined. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated, and a contract start date is implied by the duration and deadline. However, financing information is not explicitly provided, and the document URL is not directly available in this summary.

Financing information not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender is active and has a clear status.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear CPV code and EU directive adherence.
Comprehensive set of required documents provided.
E-procurement utilized.
Detailed technical and contractual documents available.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing specific evaluation criteria for economic benefit.
Potential for a short submission deadline.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for economic benefit.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if deemed too short for comprehensive bid preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline