Skip to main content
Tenders

RENOVATION OF A MULTI-APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (PARKO G. 12, MARIJAMPOLĖ)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6966496
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

RENOVATION OF A MULTI-APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (PARKO G. 12, MARIJAMPOLĖ)
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Specialiosios sąlygosPDF
Atviro_konkurso_specialiosios_sąlygos_Parko_...

This document contains the special conditions for a public procurement tender for construction technical supervision services for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building in Marijampolė.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 84.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6966496.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for construction supervision services for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building in Marijampolė, Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with corrupted data, likely related to an ESPD request for a multi-apartment building renovation project in Marijampolė.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6966496_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 130.9 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public entity. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a procedural gap.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. The 'Special Conditions' document likely contains detailed technical requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The number of documents is specified.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. Access to documents is implied through the listed files. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for transparency. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. A contract duration of 12 months is provided. However, the lack of disclosed financial information and the absence of specific financing details might hinder practical assessment for some bidders.

Value not disclosed
No e-submission (contradicts 'E-Procurement' characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. No suspensions or disputes are indicated. The 'active' status is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and NUTS code provided
Open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Documents available for download
E-Procurement indicated

Concerns

Estimated Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Missing reveal date
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and confirm its availability.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline