Skip to main content
Tenders

33557 ARIS business architecture tool (or equivalent) licenses with support services

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6961919
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€550,329
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
96%
578 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

ARIS business architecture tool (or equivalent) licenses with support services
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_6961919.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of ARIS (or equivalent) activity architecture tool licenses with support services in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6961919_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a competitive negotiation tender for ARIS (or equivalent) activity architecture tool licenses with support services, requiring a complete tender submission.

0_Pirkimo sąlygos_Purchasing_Terms_and_Conditions.zipZIP
0_Pirkimo sąlygos_Purchasing_Terms_and_Condit... -- 680.9 KB

No content extracted

1_Techninė_specifikacija_Technical_Specification.zipZIP
1_Techninė_specifikacija_Technical_Specificat... -- 139.5 KB

No content extracted

3_Paraiška_ir_priedai_Application_Attachments.zipZIP
3_Paraiška_ir_priedai_Application_Attachments... -- 208.6 KB

No content extracted

3_Pirminis_pasiūlymas_Initial_Proposal.zipZIP
3_Pirminis_pasiūlymas_Initial_Proposal.zip -- 68.6 KB

No content extracted

4_Galutinis_pasiūlymas_Final_Proposal.zipZIP
4_Galutinis_pasiūlymas_Final_Proposal.zip -- 137.3 KB

No content extracted

5_Kiti_priedai_Other_documents.zipZIP
5_Kiti_priedai_Other_documents.zip -- 142.6 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for activity architecture tool licenses and support services is generally well-structured, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information. The documentation is mostly available, though some content summaries are missing.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure type. Deadlines are provided, and the tender is active. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date for the opening could be a minor compliance concern.

Missing reveal date for opening
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The title and description clearly state the procurement objective. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected documentation. However, the lack of specific evaluation criteria and detailed content summaries for some attached documents reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Missing content summaries for some documents
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While several documents are attached, the lack of content summaries for some ZIP files hinders a full assessment of completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing content summaries for some documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The procedure type suggests a competitive process. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria could potentially lead to perceived unfairness if not clarified.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information regarding e-submission details and financing sources, along with the absence of a contract start date, impacts the overall practicality for potential bidders.

No explicit e-submission details
No contract start date specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
E-procurement utilized
CPV code provided
Active tender status with logical dates

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline