Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login9 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.
LoginThis tender for an out-of-hours repair call handling service is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.
The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the estimated value is disclosed. There is no indication of disputes. The procedure appears compliant with standard procurement practices, though the absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.
The description of the service is clear, outlining the primary purpose and anticipated call volume. Requirements for experience and customer service understanding are stated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how tenders will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start date are also provided. However, the absence of content for the attached documents is a significant gap, hindering a full assessment of completeness.
The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. Requirements for qualification and experience are objective. The use of the Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) principle is standard. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
While a deadline and contract start date are provided, the lack of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL for documents reduces practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the contract duration is specified.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent within the tender information.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are areas for potential improvement to align with modern sustainability goals.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required