Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of a multi-apartment residential building (J. Basanavičiaus Ave. 3, Marijampolė)

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6956309
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Marijampole County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Marijampole County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of a multi-apartment residential building (J. Basanavičiaus Ave. 3, Marijampolė)
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Sutarties projektasPDF
8_priedas_Sutarties_projektas.pdf

This document contains a draft contract for technical supervision services related to the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

Bendrosios sąlygosPDF
Atviro_konkurso_bendrosios_sąlygos.pdf

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

Specialiosios sąlygosPDF
Atviro_konkurso_specialiosios_sąlygos_J._Bas...

This document contains special conditions for a public procurement tender for the technical supervision services of the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building in Marijampolė.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 84.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6956309.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for construction supervision services for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building in Marijampolė, Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains ESPD request files in XML and PDF formats, likely related to a tender for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6956309_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload, for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 130.9 KB

This document is a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the renovation of a multi-apartment residential building.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable procedure. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for bids, which is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. The available documents, including general and special conditions, provide a good basis for understanding the requirements. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and all documents appear to be accessible. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process. The lack of disclosed value is a minor detractor from full transparency.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive. However, the specific mechanism for e-submission is not explicitly detailed, and the contract start date is not provided. Financing information is also absent.

No e-submission details
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is correctly assigned.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure with EU directive compliance
CPV and NUTS codes provided
Multiple relevant documents available
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing contract start date and e-submission details

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to aid bidder assessment.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Provide specific details on the e-submission process and contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline