Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login5 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
9 documents available with AI summaries
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
No content extracted
This document contains a tender notice for international public procurement of training instructor services for young scouts' camps in Lithuania, aiming to establish a dynamic purchasing system.
This document contains a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD) for a tender concerning training instructor services for young scouts.
This document contains instructions and a mandatory field for submitting a proposal file within a restricted tender procedure for training instructor services.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for training instructor services for young scouts' camps is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality and clarity.
The tender adheres to general legal requirements for a restricted procedure under EU directives. The CPV code is appropriate, and the organization is a public body. The main issue is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal and procedural gap. The deadline, while potentially short, is not explicitly stated as unreasonable without further context on the complexity of the tender.
The tender title, description, and basic information are clear. The availability of multiple documents, including application forms and declarations, is positive. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.
Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. A good number of documents are attached. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potentially insufficient detail in the 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' section means some crucial information for bidders is missing.
The tender appears fair, with the estimated value disclosed and the procedure being restricted, implying a structured selection process. The availability of multiple document formats (Word, XML, PDF) and the use of e-procurement are positive. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.
The tender is active and has a submission deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which is a significant drawback for modern procurement. The 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' are not detailed, requiring bidders to infer much from attached documents.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of a tender.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required