Skip to main content
Tenders

6946293 Three-way stopcocks (for infusion systems) (open tender (simplified procurement))

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6946293
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Three-way stopcocks (for infusion systems)
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAIDOC
BENDRIEJI REIKALAVIMAI.docx

This document contains the tender conditions for the procurement of three-channel stopcocks for infusion systems by Kauno Klinikos, outlining the object of the purchase, supplier exclusion grounds, and required qualifications.

Pasiūlymo forma (1 priedas)DOC
Pasiūlymo forma (1 priedas).docx

This document contains a bid submission form for the procurement of three-channel stopcocks for infusion systems, requiring bidder details and confirmation of acceptance of tender conditions.

Sutarties projektas (2 priedas)DOC
Sutarties projektas (2 priedas).docx

This document contains the special conditions for the purchase and sale agreement, specifically the technical specification and product list for three-channel infusion system taps.

Techninė specifikacija (3 priedas)DOC
Techninė specifikacija (3 priedas).docx

This document contains the technical specifications for sterile, single-use, three-channel infusion system stopcocks made of polycarbonate or equivalent material, with specific connection types and features, and requires bidders to submit valid CE certificates.

EBVPD (4 priedas)PDF
EBVPD (4 priedas).pdf

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning three-channel stopcocks for infusion systems, requiring bidders to provide information about their economic operator status and exclusion grounds.

NoticePDF
Notice_6946293.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of three-channel stopcocks for infusion systems by the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital Kauno Klinikos.

Prekių pirkimo-pardavimo sutarčių bendrosios sąlygos (6 priedas)PDF
Prekių pirkimo-pardavimo sutarčių bendrosios ...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for the purchase and sale of goods, specifically defining terms and outlining the interpretation and hierarchy of contract documents for the procurement of three-channel infusion system taps.

Kainų pasiūlymo lentelė (5 priedas)XLS
Kainų pasiūlymo lentelė (5 priedas).xlsx

This document contains a price proposal table for three-way stopcocks for infusion systems, requiring bidders to provide unit prices and total costs.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6946293_1.xml

This document outlines the structure of a tender for three-channel infusion systems, specifying an open procedure with the lowest price evaluation criterion and indicating that a complete tender file is mandatory.

EBVPD (4 priedas)XML
EBVPD (4 priedas).xml

This document contains a request for information regarding participation in criminal organizations as an exclusion criterion for bidders in a tender for three-channel infusion system cannulas.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for three-channel stopcocks is active with a reasonably structured documentation set. Key areas for improvement include the disclosure of estimated value and clearer specification of evaluation criteria, although the process benefits from e-procurement.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (Code: 2014/24/ES) and is active. The CPV code is appropriate, and the presence of a contract draft suggests regulatory awareness. However, the 'No disputes' statistic, while positive, doesn't offer insight into potential legal challenges.

Clarity80/100

The tender description is concise. While several key documents are provided, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria creates ambiguity regarding the decision-making process for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and attached documents. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, impacting bidders' initial assessment of the opportunity.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The disclosure of the liable person and contact details is positive. No specific company tailoring is evident, and the inclusion of multiple relevant documents (ESPD, offer form, price table, technical specs, contract draft) contributes to fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a strong positive. However, a 'Missing reveal date' is noted, and the submission deadline, while provided, is relatively short given the tender's complexity and number of documents. Specific financing information beyond 'EU Funded' is not detailed.

Missing reveal date
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The 'active' status aligns with the submission and opening dates. No disputes or suspensions are reported, indicating data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided details, limiting the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Active e-procurement process
Comprehensive set of required documents (ESPD, technical specs, contract draft)
Clear identification of organization and contact person
Appropriate CPV code and NUTS code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Short submission deadline relative to document volume
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement to aid bidder assessment.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fair competition.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if possible, or ensuring bidders have sufficient time to prepare comprehensive submissions.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline