Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of Containers for Collection of Paper, Plastic, Metal and Glass Packaging Waste

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6940325
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Siauliai County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Siauliai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to purchase 500 pcs. of paper, plastic, metal packaging and 500 pcs. of glass
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on specific submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information available on specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on specific eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on specific technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information available on specific financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Prekių viešojo pirkimo - pardavimo sutarties projektasDOC
prekių viešojo pirkimo-pardavimo sutarties_pr...

This document contains the draft of a goods purchase and sale agreement, outlining general and special conditions for the procurement of paper, plastic, metal, and glass packaging.

TS priedasDOC
raidžių dydis.docx

This document contains technical specifications for labeling different types of containers with specific font sizes and line spacing.

Skelbiamos apklausos bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Skelbiama apklausa BS_.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure to acquire packaging materials, outlining definitions, general provisions, the procurement object, and communication methods.

Skelbiamos apklausos specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Skelbiama apklausa SS_.docx

This document contains the special conditions for a tender by UAB Kuršėnų komunalinis ūkis to procure 500 paper, plastic, metal packaging containers and 500 glass packaging containers.

NoticePDF
Notice_6940325.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of 500 units of paper, plastic, metal packaging waste containers and 500 units of glass packaging waste containers in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6940325_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a simplified open tender procedure for the procurement of packaging materials, requiring bidders to submit a complete tender file.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for waste containers is generally well-structured and clearly defined, although it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and explicit sustainability goals. The primary concerns lie in the absence of disclosed financial value and potential for limited competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to most legal requirements, including CPV code and proper document structure. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' for submissions is a minor oversight. The relatively short submission deadline of about 2.5 weeks might be considered tight by some potential bidders, impacting compliance with 'reasonable deadlines' in some jurisdictions, though not explicitly a legal violation based on provided info. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

Missing reveal date for submissions.
Clarity80/100

The core requirements, such as the number and types of containers, are clear. Technical specifications for labeling are provided. The general and special conditions, as well as the contract draft, offer a good understanding of the contractual framework. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, and CPV code. Key documents like the contract notice, technical specifications, general and special conditions, and contract draft are attached. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant gap in completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The access to all necessary documents seems to be provided. Criteria for evaluation are unfortunately missing, which could lead to subjective assessments. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies, which is good for fairness. However, the undisclosed value limits transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Value not disclosed.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for ease of submission. Key dates are specified. The contract duration of 4 months is provided. However, the tender does not explicitly state 'e-submission' within the procurement characteristics, although it is listed under 'Characteristics: E-Procurement'. Financing information is not disclosed, and the short contract duration might not be practical for large-scale suppliers.

Financing information not disclosed.
Short contract duration (4 months) may limit participation.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, CPV code, and contract duration are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline and opening date) are consecutive and logical. This section is strong.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not stated if it is EU funded. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Strengths

Clear identification of the procurement object and quantities.
Availability of essential tender documents (contract notice, technical specs, draft contract).
Use of e-procurement system.
CPV code and NUTS code provided.

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed, impacting transparency and potential bidder interest.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria, leading to potential ambiguity.
Short contract duration (4 months) might deter some bidders.
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation requirements.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the procurement to increase transparency and attract a wider range of bidders.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria to ensure a fair and objective selection process.
3. Consider extending the contract duration or specifying possibilities for extension if longer-term supply is needed.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline