Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of explanatory memorandum and construction of Pakava street surface renewal and parking lot at Stāķi PII

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168907
Value
€28,420
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€28,420
Duration
7 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of explanatory memorandum and construction of Pakava street surface renewal and parking lot at Stāķi PII

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the document summaries.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided in the document summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the document summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the document summaries.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided in the document summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168907_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323113944.pdf -- 97.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development and construction of road surface renewal and parking lot installation near Stāķi PII in Gulbene municipality.

Līguma projektsDOC
8_pielikums_Liguma_projekts.doc -- 240.5 KB

This document contains the draft contract for the reconstruction and installation of a parking lot at Stāķu PII, outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and project timelines.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_GNP_2026_17.doc -- 188.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for a public procurement tender for the development of a design and construction project for road surface renewal and parking lot construction.

Objekta atrašanās vietaDOC
Objekta atrašanās vieta.docx -- 460.2 KB

This document contains a visual representation of the object's location in nature and a parking lot near Stāķi PII.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender GNP 2026/17, which is for the development and construction of a pavement renovation and parking lot at Stāķi PII in Gulbene municipality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pavement renovation and parking lot construction is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect legal compliance if challenges arise.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the restricted access to some documents reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Restricted document access
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and key documents like the contract draft and regulations. However, the lack of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in the provided summaries is a significant omission.

No specific eligibility requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the restricted access to some documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about full transparency and equal opportunity for all bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date implied by the reveal date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. While e-procurement is mentioned, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the restricted document access can hinder practical participation.

No e-submission details
Restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted disputes or suspensions. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code provided
E-Procurement utilized
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in summaries

Recommendations

1. Provide clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure full access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
3. Include detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline