Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Armored vehicles

Open
Deadline
16 days left
April 21, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6923585
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 14, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 21, 2026

Tender Opening

April 21, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€703,059
Avg. Bids
3.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
96%
2,253 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Project No. SVVP/2025/336 "Armored vehicles for responding to STS violations,"
EU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for armored vehicles, evaluated solely on the lowest price, presents a clear opportunity for cost-competitive bidders. Success hinges on demonstrating robust technical capability and meticulous adherence to mandatory requirements, while leveraging any potential for value-added services not explicitly excluded.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Compliance and Technical Excellence at the Lowest Price.

Reliable and Secure Armored Vehicle Solutions Tailored for Law Enforcement Needs.

Key Opportunities
The explicit 'lowest price' evaluation criterion simplifies the competitive landscape, allowing cost leaders to dominate.
The absence of specific 'green' or 'innovative' procurement requirements reduces the complexity of the bid, focusing efforts on core technical and price aspects.
Potential to offer value-added services or extended warranties as a differentiator, provided they do not violate any explicit tender terms.
Key Challenges
Intense price competition due to the 'lowest price' evaluation criterion.

Focus on optimizing production costs, supply chain efficiency, and potentially exploring economies of scale. Conduct thorough cost analysis to ensure profitability at a competitive price point.

Ensuring absolute compliance with all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, as any failure leads to immediate disqualification.

Implement a rigorous internal review process for all ESPD and exclusion ground documentation. Seek legal counsel if any ambiguity exists regarding exclusion criteria.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price means that technical compliance is binary (pass/fail), requiring meticulous attention to detail in technical specifications.

Thoroughly analyze all technical capability requirements and ensure the proposed vehicles demonstrably meet or exceed them. Provide clear, concise, and verifiable evidence of compliance.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established manufacturer or supplier of specialized armored vehicles with a proven track record in meeting stringent technical specifications and a highly efficient, cost-optimized production and supply chain. The ideal bidder will have a strong understanding of procurement regulations and a streamlined submission process.
Key Requirements
Demonstration of meeting Technical Capability Requirements for armored vehicles.
Satisfying Mandatory Exclusion Grounds (e.g., participation in criminal organizations).
Completion and accuracy of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
Submission of a bid based on the lowest price.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated lowest total cost of ownership, not just initial purchase price (if this can be subtly implied through robust specifications and reliability).
Exceptional track record in supplying similar specialized vehicles to law enforcement agencies, evidenced by strong references.
Agile and responsive post-delivery support and maintenance capabilities, even if not a primary evaluation factor.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No' is stated, consider subtly highlighting any existing workforce development programs or local employment initiatives within the company's general profile, if permissible within the submission format, as a minor positive reinforcement.
Bid Focus Areas
Lowest Price100%

Develop a highly competitive pricing strategy based on optimized production costs, efficient supply chain management, and a clear understanding of the client's budget expectations. Ensure all costs are accurately factored in to avoid underbidding and subsequent unprofitability.

Recommendations5
Master the ESPD and Exclusion Grounds
CriticalHigh effort

Dedicate significant resources to accurately and completely filling out the ESPD (DOCUMENT 3) and thoroughly addressing all mandatory exclusion grounds, particularly those related to criminal organizations (DOCUMENT 2). Any omission or inaccuracy will lead to disqualification.

Ensures eligibility and avoids immediate rejection.
Price Optimization and Cost Analysis
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct a detailed cost-benefit analysis to determine the lowest viable price that ensures profitability. Explore all avenues for cost reduction in manufacturing, logistics, and overhead without compromising essential quality or compliance.

Maximizes the chance of winning on the sole evaluation criterion.
Demonstrate Technical Capability Rigorously
CriticalHigh effort

Meticulously review and address all Technical Capability Requirements. Provide clear, verifiable evidence (specifications, certifications, test results) that the proposed armored vehicles fully meet or exceed the stated needs of the contracting authority.

Ensures the bid passes the technical 'pass/fail' threshold.
Highlight Proven Reliability and Support
MediumMed effort

While price is paramount, subtly emphasize the reliability and longevity of the proposed vehicles through strong past performance data and references. If possible, mention efficient after-sales support or maintenance capabilities as a secondary benefit.

Builds confidence in the long-term value proposition.
Thorough Review of General Terms and Conditions
MediumMed effort

Scrutinize DOCUMENT 1 (Atviro konkurso bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos) for any clauses that might impact pricing, delivery, or contractual obligations. Ensure the bid is fully aligned with these general provisions.

Prevents unforeseen contractual issues and ensures bid feasibility.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective provider of compliant and reliable armored vehicles. Emphasize operational efficiency and a streamlined supply chain that enables competitive pricing without sacrificing essential quality.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Atviro konkurso bendrosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso bendrosios.docx

This document contains the general terms and conditions for an open tender procedure for the procurement of armored vehicles to respond to STS violations, outlining definitions, general provisions, and the structure of tender documents.

Atviro konkurso specialiosios pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Atviro_konkurso_specialiosios_sal.docx

This document contains the special procurement conditions for an open tender for armored vehicles, including technical specifications and requirements related to national security.

Pasiūlymo formaDOC
Pasiūlymas Šarvuotis.docx

This document is a bid submission form for armored vehicles, requiring bidders to provide supplier information, pricing details, and confirm compliance with national security and sanctions regulations.

Sutarties projektasDOC
Sutarties sąlygos.docx

This document contains the draft contract for the purchase and sale of armored vehicles, outlining general terms and conditions including definitions, contract interpretation, and document hierarchy.

ESPD PDFPDF
espd-request.pdf

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the procurement of armored vehicles for responding to STS violations by the Lithuanian Police Department.

NoticePDF
Notice_6923585.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of armored vehicles for the Lithuanian Police Department.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6923585_1.xml

This document contains the tender structure for an open procedure evaluating the lowest price for armored vehicles, with a mandatory file submission required.

ESPT XMLXML
espd-request.xml

This document contains a European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request for a tender concerning armored vehicles, specifically querying about participation in criminal organizations.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for armored vehicles is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is stated as 'OPEN'. No disputes are indicated. The legal framework appears sound.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the tender documents provide general and specific conditions. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, CPV, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The AI-extracted requirements are also missing.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No AI-extracted requirements available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with full document access indicated by the number of documents provided. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. Criteria are not explicitly stated, but the absence of tailored requirements suggests a fair process.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of explicit financing information might pose challenges for bidders. The contract start date is not specified.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates for submission and opening are logical. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Proper CPV code and legal procedure (2014/24/ES)
Multiple relevant tender documents provided
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing contract start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Specify the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline