Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Disposable medical devices for robotic surgery

Open
Deadline
15 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6922482
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Disposable medical devices for robotic surgery
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for disposable medical devices for robotic surgery presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating superior product quality, reliable supply chain, and a strong understanding of robotic surgery needs, while proactively addressing the lack of specified evaluation criteria by assuming a strong emphasis on technical merit and price.

Key Winning Messages

Uncompromising Quality and Safety for Robotic Surgery

Reliable and Efficient Supply Chain for Critical Medical Devices

Value-Driven Solution Optimized for Clinical Outcomes and Hospital Efficiency

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive definition of value proposition.
Green Procurement requirement can be leveraged as a differentiator if robust sustainability practices are in place.
Long contract duration (37 months) favors bidders with strong production capacity and supply chain stability.
Focus on disposable nature of devices implies a need for high-volume, cost-effective solutions.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria creates uncertainty regarding weighting and focus.

Assume a strong emphasis on technical merit and price. Prepare a comprehensive technical proposal that clearly articulates product superiority and a competitive pricing strategy. Conduct market research to infer likely evaluation priorities for similar tenders.

Potential for high competition given the CPV code and the nature of the product.

Focus on clear differentiation through product innovation (even if not explicitly requested), superior quality certifications, and a robust, transparent supply chain. Highlight any unique selling propositions that align with the hospital's likely needs for robotic surgery.

Garbled README.txt suggests potential for unclear or incomplete tender documentation.

Thoroughly review all provided documents, including the ESPD. If any ambiguities or inconsistencies are found, proactively submit clarification requests to the contracting authority well in advance of the deadline.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established medical device manufacturer or distributor with a proven track record in supplying high-quality, sterile, single-use surgical instruments, specifically those compatible with robotic surgery systems. The ideal bidder possesses robust quality assurance processes, efficient logistics, and the capacity to meet potentially high demand over a 37-month contract period.
Key Requirements
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Eligibility Requirements
Technical Capability Requirements
Financial Requirements
Submission Requirements
Compliance with Green Procurement
Product Quality and Sterility
Supply Chain Reliability
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated compatibility and performance with leading robotic surgery platforms.
Exceptional quality control and sterility assurance processes, potentially exceeding standard requirements.
Proactive and transparent supply chain management, including contingency plans.
Evidence of cost-effectiveness and value beyond just the unit price (e.g., reduced procedure time, improved patient outcomes).
Commitment to sustainable manufacturing and packaging practices, even if not a primary evaluation criterion.
Social Value Opportunities
Commit to sourcing materials from suppliers with strong ethical labor practices and environmental standards, contributing to a more responsible supply chain.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability

Provide detailed specifications, certifications (ISO 13485, CE marking), and evidence of product performance and safety in robotic surgery. Highlight sterility assurance and biocompatibility. Showcase experience with similar high-stakes medical devices.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing model that reflects the long-term value and reliability of the supply. Consider volume discounts and potential for cost savings through efficiency. Benchmark against market rates for similar products.

Supply Chain and Delivery

Detail robust inventory management, logistics, and delivery schedules. Include contingency plans for supply chain disruptions. Emphasize timely and reliable delivery to the Klaipėda University Hospital.

Green Procurement

Outline specific initiatives for reducing environmental impact, such as sustainable packaging, energy-efficient manufacturing, and waste reduction. Quantify these efforts where possible.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address ESPD and Eligibility
CriticalHigh effort

Ensure all sections of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) are completed accurately and comprehensively. Verify that all eligibility requirements, including legal status, financial standing, and technical capacity, are met and clearly evidenced.

Avoids immediate disqualification.
Assume Technical Merit and Price as Key Drivers
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, structure the bid to strongly emphasize product quality, safety, and performance for robotic surgery, alongside a competitive and value-driven pricing strategy. Prepare detailed technical documentation and a clear cost breakdown.

Maximizes scoring potential in the absence of defined criteria.
Highlight Supply Chain Robustness and Reliability
HighMed effort

Detail the bidder's supply chain management capabilities, including inventory control, logistics, and contingency plans for potential disruptions. Emphasize the ability to consistently deliver high-quality, sterile devices over the 37-month contract period.

Builds confidence in the supplier's ability to meet ongoing needs.
Proactively Seek Clarification on Documentation
HighLow effort

If the garbled README.txt or any other tender document appears incomplete or ambiguous, submit formal clarification requests to VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė well in advance of the submission deadline.

Ensures full understanding of requirements and avoids misinterpretations.
Integrate Sustainable Practices into Green Procurement
MediumMed effort

Go beyond minimum requirements for green procurement. Detail specific initiatives related to packaging, material sourcing, and waste reduction. Quantify environmental benefits where possible to demonstrate a genuine commitment.

Enhances bid attractiveness and aligns with public sector sustainability goals.
Prepare for Potential Competitor Strengths
MediumMed effort

Anticipate that competitors may also offer high-quality products. Focus on demonstrating superior value, service, and reliability, and clearly articulate the unique benefits of your offering.

Strengthens competitive positioning.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable and high-quality supplier of disposable medical devices for robotic surgery, emphasizing patient safety and clinical efficacy.
Highlight the bidder's commitment to a seamless and uninterrupted supply chain, crucial for the critical nature of robotic surgery.
Demonstrate a clear understanding of the hospital's operational needs and how the proposed solution will contribute to efficiency and cost-effectiveness over the contract's duration.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Sutarties sąlygosDOC
10_priedas_Sutartis__Specialiosios ir Bendros...

This document contains the contract draft, specifically the special conditions for the purchase and sale of goods, including definitions and interpretation of the contract, and the subject of the contract.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso Bendrosios sąlygos .docx

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for a public procurement process conducted via open tender for disposable medical devices for robotic surgery, detailing definitions, procedures, and legal frameworks.

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso Specialiosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for single-use medical devices for robotic surgery, outlining requirements, submission procedures, and evaluation criteria for bidders.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 79.7 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6922482.pdf

This document is a tender notice from VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė for the procurement of disposable medical devices for robotic surgery, specifically surgical instruments.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with potentially corrupted or encoded data related to a tender for disposable medical devices for robotic surgery.

Pasiūlymo forma ir techninė specifikacijaXLS
Pasiulymo_forma ir techninė specifikacija_6 d...

This document contains the offer form and technical specifications for single-use medical devices for robotic surgery.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6922482_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for robotic surgery medical devices.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 218.0 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender concerning disposable medical devices for robotic surgery.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for single-use medical devices for robotic surgery is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes essential legal documents like the ESPD request and contract draft. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and lists mandatory requirements such as exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements. The procurement conditions and technical specifications are available, contributing to good clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the organization, reference number, contract duration, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts the completeness of financial information.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Access to documents is provided, and the process is e-procurement enabled. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (contradiction)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This area is underdeveloped.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open procedure (2014/24/ES)
Availability of tender documents
E-procurement characteristic

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline