Skip to main content
Tenders

Reagents for the study of neurofilament light chains by ELISA method (12396) (simplified open

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6915588
Value
€14,780
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€14,780
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reagents for the study of neurofilament light chains by ELISA method are purchased. Information is provided
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Reagents for neurofilament light chain testing by ELISA method
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

[SAK] Bendrosios_pirkimo_sąlygos.docxDOC
[SAK] Bendrosios_pirkimo_sąlygos.docx -- 93.2 KB

No content extracted

[SAK]_Specialiosios_pirkimo_salygos.docxDOC
[SAK]_Specialiosios_pirkimo_salygos.docx -- 60.7 KB

No content extracted

SPS 2 priedas „Pasiūlymo forma“.docxDOC
SPS 2 priedas „Pasiūlymo forma“.docx -- 25.4 KB

No content extracted

SPS 3 priedas Sutarties projekt.docxDOC
SPS 3 priedas Sutarties projekt.docx -- 110.9 KB

No content extracted

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 84.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6915588.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of reagents for neurofilament light chain assays using the ELISA method by VšĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file, likely an ESPD request in XML or PDF format, related to the procurement of reagents for neurofilament light chain research.

TS_2026-03-05_.xlsXLS
TS_2026-03-05_.xls -- 37.5 KB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6915588_1.xml

This document contains the structure for an open tender procedure for purchasing reagents for neurofilament light chain research using the ELISA method, with two lots and evaluation based on the lowest price.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.6 KB

This document contains a request for an electronic simplified procurement document (ESPD) related to the procurement of reagents for neurofilament light chain research using the ELISA method.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reagents is largely well-structured, offering clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on green or social procurement, which limits its overall score.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (2014/24/ES) and provides a clear CPV code. The stated deadlines and contract duration are within reasonable bounds, and there is no indication of disputes. The procedure is open, which is a standard legal framework. A missing reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required reagents is specific (neurofilament light chain assays by ELISA method). The presence of various document types suggests an effort to provide necessary information, although the content of many documents is not detailed. Explicit evaluation criteria are notably absent.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline is present. The contract duration is specified. A significant number of tender documents are listed, although their content is not always summarized, which impacts the perception of completeness. Key requirements like exclusion and eligibility grounds are not explicitly detailed within the provided text.

Key requirements (exclusion, eligibility, financial) not detailed
Content of several documents not summarized
Fairness85/100

The tender is advertised as an open procedure with no indication of tailored requirements to specific companies. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement suggests a fair process. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a concern for fairness, but generally, the process appears objective.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as E-Procurement, which is a positive for submission ease. However, the text does not explicitly confirm e-submission capability or provide a direct URL for document submission, which is a practical drawback. Financing information is not detailed. The contract start date is not provided.

No explicit confirmation of e-submission functionality
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, submission deadline, and contract duration are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission, opening) are sequential and logical.

Sustainability50/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided tender details. This lack of information scores it moderately.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, reference, organization, value, deadline)
Open procurement procedure adhering to EU regulations
CPV code provided
E-Procurement designation
Availability of multiple tender documents

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of details on sustainability/social/innovation aspects
Content of some documents not summarized
Contract start date and explicit e-submission confirmation not provided

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Include details regarding sustainability, social, or innovation aspects if applicable.
3. Provide a clear contract start date and confirm e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline