Skip to main content
Tenders

Document archiving and digitization services (Open tender)

Open
Deadline
23 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6914101
Value
€248,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€248,000
Duration
8 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Document archiving and digitization services
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygos _ patvirtintos 2026-03-13DOC
Pirkimo sąlygos _ Dokumentų archyvavimas _ 20...

This document contains the terms and conditions for an international open tender by the National Land Service under the Ministry of Environment for document archiving and digitization services.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 93.5 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6914101.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for document archiving and digitization services in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 248,000 Euros.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a compressed file, likely containing an ESPD request in XML and PDF formats, related to document archiving and digitization services.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6914101_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a file upload for the 'File' criterion, and is part of an open procedure for document archiving and digitization services.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 140.0 KB

This document contains a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD) for the tender regarding document archiving and digitization services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for document archiving and digitization services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and attached documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a specified reveal date, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a minor concern regarding procedural clarity but does not immediately suggest non-compliance.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. The presence of multiple document types (terms and conditions, ESPD request, contract notice) aids understanding. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant gap in clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Six tender documents are provided, including essential ones like terms and conditions and ESPD requests. The lack of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria reduces overall completeness.

Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting broad access. The value is disclosed, and criteria for exclusion and eligibility are mentioned as requirements. The lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a concern for fairness if not addressed in the full documentation.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is intended. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract duration and start date are not explicitly linked, and financing information is absent.

Contradictory information on e-submission
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
CPV code provided
Multiple relevant tender documents attached

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing reveal date
Contradictory information regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clarify the evaluation criteria and the reveal date.
2. Ensure consistency regarding e-submission procedures.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline