Skip to main content
Tenders

Disposable items for pulmonology

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6912092
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Klaipeda County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Klaipeda County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Disposable items for pulmonology
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

1DOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains definitions of terms and abbreviations used in the tender for disposable pulmonary equipment and outlines the general provisions for the procurement process.

3DOC
Konkurso sąlygos.docx

This document contains tender specifications for the procurement of disposable pulmonary equipment by VšĮ Klaipėdos universiteto ligoninė, including technical requirements and submission guidelines.

5DOC
Viešojo_pirkimo-pardavimo_sutarties_projektas...

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a goods purchase and sale agreement, defining key terms and outlining the hierarchy of contractual documents.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 73.1 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6912092.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of disposable pulmonology supplies by Klaipėda University Hospital in Lithuania, with specific lots including EBUS biopsy needles and balloons.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a corrupted file, likely an ESPD request in XML or PDF format, related to a tender for disposable pulmonary equipment.

4XLS
Pasiulymo_forma.xlsx

This document contains a proposal form for the procurement of disposable pulmonology supplies for Klaipėda University Hospital.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6912092_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for an open procedure with four lots.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 99.0 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for the tender "Vienkartinės priemonės pulmonologijai".

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for disposable pulmonology supplies is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing. The short submission deadline is a minor concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with standard EU procurement procedures (Open Procedure). Deadlines are present, and the CPV code is appropriate. The absence of disclosed disputes suggests a smooth process so far. However, the short submission deadline and lack of a revealed date are minor drawbacks.

Missing reveal date
Short submission deadline
Clarity80/100

The description of the subject matter is clear. Several key documents like technical specifications, contract draft, and proposal forms are available, contributing to clarity. However, evaluation criteria are not specified, which can lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. Nine tender documents are attached, covering various aspects of the procurement. The estimated value is not disclosed, and financing information is absent, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financing information absent
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. E-procurement is indicated, which is positive. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies. Full document access is implied by the number of documents provided. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, which is a positive for practical submission. However, there is no explicit mention of e-submission as a mandatory requirement, and the URL for document access is not directly provided in the extracted data. Financing information is missing.

No explicit e-submission requirement mentioned
Financing information absent
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, although the submission deadline is short. The structure of the data is consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards, but specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria are not explicitly mentioned or detailed in the provided information. This suggests a moderate approach to sustainability.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Appropriate CPV code
Multiple relevant documents provided
Indicated as E-Procurement

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline or ensuring it is sufficiently reasonable for the scope.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline