Skip to main content
Tenders

ČIULAI MANOR ESTATE LORD'S HOUSE REPAIR AND CONSTRUCTION WORKS (JA)

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6888202
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Utena County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
19 months
Location
Utena County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€6,132,447
Avg. Bids
4.1
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
90%
960 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Procurement No. 19929
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on specific submission requirements]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No information on specific mandatory exclusion grounds]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on specific eligibility requirements]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on specific technical capability requirements]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No information on specific financial requirements]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.7 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6888202.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for construction works related to the renovation and construction of the Čiulų Manor homestead's manor house in Lithuania.

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
Pirkimo dokumentai.rar

No content extracted

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains an ESPD request in XML and PDF format, likely for a procurement process.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6888202_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for the first round of an open procurement process.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.4 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for tender Pirkimo Nr. 19929.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction works at Čiulų Dvaras manor house is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a standard open procedure. CPV code is provided, and the organization is a public body. No disputes are indicated. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. The main weakness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant legal requirement for transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title and description of the works are clear. Key documents like the contract notice and ESPD request are provided. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the AI-extracted section leads to a lack of detailed clarity on what is expected from bidders.

No specific eligibility requirements provided
No specific technical capability requirements provided
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. Contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the extracted information, making the tender incomplete.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Mandatory exclusion grounds: Not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The use of ESPD is standard. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria raise concerns about transparency and potential bias. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, which is positive.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. Documents are available, including ESPD request. However, the lack of explicit e-submission instructions and the absence of financing information and contract start date reduce its practicality for bidders.

No e-submission specified
Financing information: Not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. The main inconsistency is the lack of detailed requirements that should logically be present in a tender of this nature.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description of works
EU Funded and E-Procurement characteristics
Standard EU procurement procedure (2014/24/ES)
Availability of ESPD request documents

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
No explicit mention of sustainability or innovation

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline