Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

DESIGN AND SUPERVISION OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION FOR THE BUILDING AT EUROPOS PR. 25, KAUNAS

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6887291
Value
€330,579
Location
Kaunas County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Tender Opening

April 15, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€330,579
Duration
67 months
Location
Kaunas County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to acquire a building for scientific purposes, a kindergarten (public).
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires design and project execution supervision for a kindergarten reconstruction and new construction in Kaunas. A winning bid will focus on demonstrating technical expertise in educational facility design, adherence to green procurement principles, and a clear understanding of heritage site integration, while proactively addressing the lack of specified evaluation criteria.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in creating modern, safe, and stimulating educational environments within sensitive heritage contexts.

Commitment to sustainable and energy-efficient design, exceeding minimum green procurement requirements.

Proactive and collaborative project management ensuring timely and budget-conscious delivery.

Key Opportunities
Leverage the 'Green Procurement' requirement to differentiate by proposing innovative sustainable solutions beyond the minimum.
Demonstrate deep understanding of the heritage context and propose design solutions that respect and integrate with the existing cultural heritage site.
Address the preliminary nature of child/staff numbers and offer flexibility in design to maximize capacity and future-proofing.
Propose value-added services in project execution supervision, such as advanced digital tools for monitoring or enhanced stakeholder communication.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for scoring.

Assume a balanced approach focusing on technical merit, price (if applicable), and green procurement. Emphasize all aspects of the technical task and social value commitments to cover all potential evaluation angles. Consider requesting clarification from the contracting authority if possible.

Absence of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements means bidders must make assumptions.

Ensure all standard best practices for public procurement are met. Provide comprehensive documentation for all aspects of a typical tender (e.g., company registration, financial statements, relevant certifications, CVs of key personnel, portfolio of similar projects). Err on the side of providing more information than less.

Integrating new construction and reconstruction within a heritage-protected area requires careful planning and sensitive design.

Conduct thorough site analysis, engage with heritage experts early in the design process, and present a clear rationale for design choices that balance modern functionality with heritage preservation.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An architectural and engineering firm with proven experience in designing and supervising the reconstruction of public buildings, specifically educational facilities (kindergartens, schools). The ideal bidder will have a strong track record in managing projects within heritage-protected areas and a demonstrated commitment to sustainable design practices, including experience with energy efficiency and green building materials.
Key Requirements
Design and project execution supervision for reconstruction of an administrative building into a kindergarten (approx. 90 children, 20 staff).
Reconstruction of an auxiliary building (shelter) into an annex.
New construction of engineering infrastructure (sports field, parking lot).
Adherence to Green Procurement principles.
Consideration of heritage site status (Kaunas Aviation Officers' Ramovė building).
Compliance with all relevant Lithuanian construction laws and regulations (STR 1.04.04:2017 mentioned).
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in designing and supervising the construction of kindergartens or similar educational facilities, with a focus on child-centric design and safety.
A robust sustainability plan that goes beyond basic compliance, showcasing innovative energy-saving measures, material choices, and waste reduction strategies.
A clear and compelling approach to integrating the new structures and reconstructed elements with the existing heritage site, demonstrating respect for its historical significance.
A highly experienced and qualified project team with specific expertise relevant to each aspect of the project (e.g., heritage architecture, educational facility design, sustainable engineering).
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local labor during the construction supervision phase, where feasible, and prioritizing local suppliers for materials and services.
Inclusion of educational elements within the design that can be used by the kindergarten for learning about sustainability and the local environment.
A plan for community engagement during the design and construction phases, potentially involving local residents or future users in feedback sessions.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Solution (Design & Supervision)

Develop a comprehensive and innovative design concept that clearly addresses all aspects of the technical task. Highlight the team's expertise in educational facility design, heritage integration, and sustainable construction. For supervision, emphasize rigorous quality control, proactive risk management, and efficient communication protocols.

Green Procurement Compliance

Detail specific measures to achieve high energy efficiency ratings, use of sustainable materials, water conservation, and waste management. Quantify the expected environmental benefits of the proposed solutions.

Price

While not explicitly stated as an evaluation criterion, price is always a factor. Ensure a competitive yet realistic price that reflects the quality and scope of services offered. Clearly articulate the value proposition to justify the proposed cost.

Experience and Qualifications

Provide detailed case studies of similar projects, emphasizing successful outcomes, client satisfaction, and adherence to budget and schedule. Showcase the qualifications and relevant experience of the key personnel assigned to the project.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Technical Task and Special Conditions
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Techninė užduotis su priedais' and 'Specialiosios sąlygos' for all explicit and implicit requirements. Pay close attention to the details regarding the kindergarten capacity, the existing building conditions, and the specific requirements for the auxiliary building and new infrastructure.

Ensures full compliance and avoids disqualification.
Proactively Address Missing Evaluation Criteria
CriticalMed effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume a balanced approach. Develop a bid that excels in technical merit, demonstrates strong sustainability credentials, and offers competitive pricing. Highlight the team's experience and qualifications prominently.

Maximizes chances of scoring well across all potential evaluation dimensions.
Showcase Heritage Integration Expertise
HighMed effort

Develop a design narrative that clearly articulates how the new kindergarten will respectfully integrate with the Kaunas Aviation Officers' Ramovė building and its protected area. This includes aesthetic considerations, material choices, and functional zoning.

Sets the bid apart from competitors who may lack specific heritage expertise.
Integrate Enhanced Green Procurement Measures
HighMed effort

Go beyond the minimum requirements for green procurement. Propose specific, measurable initiatives for energy efficiency (e.g., passive design, renewable energy integration), sustainable material sourcing, water management, and waste reduction during both design and supervision phases.

Demonstrates commitment to sustainability and potentially achieves higher scoring if green aspects are weighted.
Prepare Comprehensive Documentation for Unspecified Requirements
HighHigh effort

Given the lack of specified eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, prepare a robust submission that includes all standard documentation (company registration, financial stability proof, relevant certifications, CVs of key personnel, portfolio of similar projects, quality management systems).

Minimizes the risk of disqualification due to missing information.
Develop a Flexible Design Approach
MediumMed effort

Acknowledge the preliminary nature of child and staff numbers and design flexibility into the proposal. Outline how the design can be adapted to accommodate potential increases in capacity while maintaining functionality and quality.

Demonstrates foresight and adaptability, appealing to the client's long-term vision.
Highlight Project Management Excellence
MediumMed effort

Emphasize a structured and transparent project management methodology for both design and supervision. This should include clear communication plans, risk management strategies, and quality assurance processes.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to deliver the project successfully.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most technically competent and experienced partner for creating a high-quality, sustainable educational facility, particularly within a heritage context. Emphasize a proactive and collaborative approach to project delivery, ensuring the contracting authority's objectives are met and exceeded. Highlight a commitment to innovation in sustainable design and construction supervision.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided on submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information provided on mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided on eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided on technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information provided on financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Specialiosios sąlygosDOC
Atviro konkurso specialiosios sąlygos projekt...

This document contains special conditions for the procurement of design and construction supervision services for a science-purpose kindergarten building in Kaunas, Lithuania, emphasizing green procurement and universal design principles.

Bendrosios sąlygosDOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx

This document contains general terms and definitions for a public procurement process, outlining the tender process, documentation, and principles to be followed.

EBVPDPDF
EBVPD espd-request.pdf

This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for a tender procedure initiated by the Kauno miesto savivaldybės administracija for the design and supervision of reconstruction and new construction services for a kindergarten building.

NoticePDF
Notice_6887291.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for architectural design and project supervision services for the reconstruction of a kindergarten building in Kaunas, Lithuania.

Sutarties projektas (7 priedas)PDF
Sutarties projektas (7priedas).pdf

This document contains the general terms and conditions for a services purchase and sale agreement, defining key terms and outlining the hierarchy of contractual documents.

EBVPDXML
EBVPD espd-request.xml

This document contains a request for information regarding participation in a criminal organization, as part of a public procurement process for a kindergarten construction project.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for architectural design and supervision services in Kaunas is generally well-structured, with most basic information provided. However, it lacks explicit details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement procedures (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which could be implicitly covered in the ESPD but are not clearly stated.

No information provided regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.
No information provided regarding eligibility requirements.
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and several key documents are provided, including technical specifications and contract drafts. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Missing submission requirements.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code are present. However, the lack of explicit details on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements means crucial documentation is missing from the main tender notice.

No information provided regarding mandatory exclusion grounds.
No information provided regarding eligibility requirements.
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The use of ESPD and the availability of multiple documents suggest a structured process. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for fairness if not detailed in the attached documents. However, no requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Missing evaluation criteria.
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The submission deadline is provided, but the overall practicality is reduced by the lack of explicit submission requirements.

No contract start date specified.
No e-submission specified (though marked as E-Procurement).
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender is active, and no disputes or suspensions are noted. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date, tender valid) are logical. The CPV code and NUTS code are present.

Sustainability50/100

The 'Specialiosios sąlygos' document mentions 'green procurement criteria', indicating some focus on sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation, and it is not stated as EU funded.

No explicit mention of social aspects.
No explicit mention of innovation focus.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Estimated value and contract duration specified.
Correct CPV code and NUTS code provided.
Multiple relevant documents attached (Technical task, ESPD, Contract drafts).
Open procedure with disclosed value.

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Lack of detailed information on mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
Potential ambiguity in submission process due to missing details.
Contract start date not specified.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed documentation for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Specify the contract start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline