Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login5 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
4 documents available with AI summaries
This document contains the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request and a bid form for the procurement of an air quality monitoring device with a drone.
This document contains a tender notice from Kaunas University of Technology for the procurement of Android and iOS mobile phones, divided into two lots.
This document announces the termination of public procurement procedure 6873128 for mobile phones due to the inclusion of unrelated documents, and informs that a new procurement will be organized.
This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for an open procedure with two lots.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for mobile phones is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and documentation. However, it lacks detail on specific evaluation and eligibility criteria, and it does not explicitly incorporate sustainability or innovation elements.
The tender adheres to open procedure (2014/24/ES) and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure, though the opening date is very close to the submission deadline. No disputes are reported. The overall legal framework seems compliant.
The tender title and description are clear, and key documents are provided. However, crucial details such as evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific eligibility/technical/financial requirements are missing from the extracted information, reducing overall clarity on how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and opening date are provided. However, the absence of detailed requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) and specific evaluation criteria means the tender package is not fully complete for potential bidders.
The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The estimated value is disclosed, and the documentation is accessible. The division into parts (Android and iOS) can increase competition. However, the lack of specified objective evaluation criteria introduces a risk of subjective assessment.
The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement,' which is a positive sign for practical submission. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission,' which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, creating uncertainty. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and value are populated. The tender status is 'active,' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the opening following the submission deadline.
The tender documents and extracted information do not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern public procurement to promote sustainability.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required