Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Consulting services for preparation for the new financing period 2028-2034 and CAP post

Open
Deadline
8 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6852168
Value
€142,560
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€142,560
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€694,267
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
89%
942 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The description of the procured services is provided in the procurement documents.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender seeks consultancy services for the 2028-2034 EU funding period and CAP preparation. The low estimated value and lack of specified evaluation criteria present an opportunity for a well-prepared bidder to leverage their expertise in EU agricultural policy and green procurement. A strong focus on demonstrating value for money and a clear understanding of the Ministry's strategic objectives will be crucial for success.

Key Winning Messages

Expertise in EU Agricultural Policy and Funding for a Seamless Transition to the 2028-2034 Period.

Commitment to Sustainable and Green Procurement Principles for a Future-Proof Agricultural Sector.

Delivering Measurable Value and Strategic Insights to the Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture.

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria allows for proactive definition of value proposition.
Green Procurement requirement offers a platform for differentiation through sustainability expertise.
Relatively low estimated value may deter larger, more complex consultancies, potentially reducing competition.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed technical and evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid precisely.

Proactively define and articulate the bidder's approach to meeting the overarching objectives, emphasizing clarity, methodology, and expected outcomes. Assume a standard evaluation based on technical merit and price, and aim for excellence in both.

Limited information on specific service requirements necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the Ministry's likely needs.

Conduct thorough research on current CAP implementation, upcoming reforms, and the Ministry's strategic priorities. Leverage existing knowledge of EU agricultural policy trends and the Lithuanian context to infer detailed requirements.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A consultancy firm with a proven track record in advising national agricultural ministries on EU funding mechanisms, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reforms, and green procurement strategies. The ideal bidder will possess deep knowledge of Lithuanian agricultural sector specifics, strong analytical and report-writing capabilities, and a team of experts with relevant experience in policy development and implementation.
Key Requirements
Consultancy services for preparation for the new 2028-2034 funding period and CAP.
Adherence to Green Procurement principles.
Submission of a compliant bid by the deadline.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in developing and implementing CAP-related strategies that have successfully secured EU funding.
A clear and actionable plan for integrating green procurement principles throughout the consultancy process.
A proposed methodology that emphasizes stakeholder engagement and knowledge transfer to the Ministry's team.
A strong understanding of the Lithuanian agricultural landscape and its specific challenges and opportunities.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to capacity building within the Ministry by providing training sessions on EU funding application processes and green procurement best practices.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Approach and Methodology

Develop a detailed, logical, and phased approach that clearly outlines how the consultancy will address the preparation for the new funding period and CAP. Emphasize innovation in methodology where possible, even if not explicitly requested. Focus on clarity, feasibility, and the ability to deliver tangible results. Highlight the team's expertise in each phase.

Understanding of EU Agricultural Policy and Lithuanian Context

Demonstrate a deep understanding of the current CAP, upcoming reforms, and the specific needs and context of the Lithuanian agricultural sector. Reference relevant EU regulations and national strategies. Show how the proposed solutions align with these frameworks.

Green Procurement Integration

Clearly articulate how green procurement principles will be embedded in the consultancy's own operations and recommendations. Provide concrete examples of how sustainability will be considered in the advice provided to the Ministry, aligning with the tender's explicit requirement.

Value for Money

Given the lack of specified criteria, implicitly demonstrate value for money by proposing a lean but effective methodology, a highly qualified team, and a clear articulation of expected outcomes and benefits that justify the proposed fee.

Recommendations7
Thoroughly Analyze Tender Documents for Implicit Requirements
CriticalMed effort

Despite the lack of explicit criteria, meticulously review all provided documents (e.g., 'Bendrosios sąlygos.docx') for any hidden clues regarding evaluation preferences, desired outcomes, or specific areas of focus. Infer requirements based on the contracting authority and the nature of the service.

Ensures bid alignment with unstated expectations, increasing relevance and scoring potential.
Proactively Define and Articulate Evaluation Criteria
CriticalHigh effort

Since evaluation criteria are not specified, the bidder should assume a standard evaluation of technical merit and price. Develop a bid that excels in both, clearly outlining the technical approach, team expertise, and proposed methodology, while ensuring the price is competitive yet reflects the value offered.

Maximizes scoring potential by addressing likely evaluation factors comprehensively.
Emphasize Green Procurement Expertise
HighMed effort

Leverage the 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: Yes' requirement. Detail how the consultancy will not only advise on green procurement but also implement it within its own service delivery. Provide specific examples of sustainable practices.

Directly addresses a stated requirement and differentiates the bid.
Conduct In-depth Research on EU CAP Reforms and Lithuanian Context
HighHigh effort

Gain a comprehensive understanding of the latest EU CAP reforms, the 2028-2034 strategic period's objectives, and the specific agricultural landscape, challenges, and policy priorities of Lithuania. This knowledge will inform the technical proposal and demonstrate expertise.

Strengthens the technical proposal and demonstrates deep understanding of the client's needs.
Integrate Capacity Building into the Proposal
MediumMed effort

Propose specific activities for knowledge transfer and capacity building for the Ministry's staff, focusing on EU funding application processes and sustainable agricultural practices. This adds social value beyond the core consultancy.

Enhances the bid's attractiveness by demonstrating a commitment to long-term client benefit and sustainability.
Develop a Flexible and Adaptable Methodology
MediumMed effort

Given the lack of detailed requirements, propose a methodology that is robust yet flexible enough to adapt to evolving needs and potential clarifications during the tender process or contract execution. Clearly outline the process for managing scope changes.

Reduces risk of non-compliance or unmet expectations due to unforeseen circumstances.
Clarify Ambiguities (If Possible)
LowLow effort

If any ambiguities remain after thorough document review, consider submitting a clarification request to the contracting authority, adhering strictly to the tender's communication protocols. This should be done cautiously to avoid revealing strategic intent.

Resolves potential misunderstandings, leading to a more accurate and compliant bid.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most insightful and practical solution for navigating the complexities of the new EU funding period and CAP, emphasizing a proactive and value-driven approach. Highlight a strong understanding of Lithuanian agricultural policy and a commitment to sustainable development through green procurement.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the tender document]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Bendrosios sąlygos.docxDOC
Bendrosios sąlygos.docx -- 111.1 KB

No content extracted

EBVPD.pdf.pdfPDF
EBVPD.pdf.pdf -- 84.2 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6852168.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for consulting services in Lithuania to prepare for the new 2028-2034 funding period and improve the implementation of the Common Agricultural Policy post-2027.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for consulting services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and potential sustainability aspects, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and has a clear CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and basic description are clear. However, the core requirements are stated to be within the procurement documents, and the AI-extracted requirements section is notably empty, indicating a potential lack of explicit clarity within the main tender notice itself. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements are missing, and the description relies heavily on external documents, suggesting that not all essential information is immediately accessible or summarized within the main tender notice.

AI-extracted requirements are empty
Description relies on external documents
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived subjectivity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the AI-extracted requirements section does not confirm e-submission capabilities, and the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission'. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is limited to 'EU Funded'.

No e-submission indicated
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission and opening) are logical. The overall data consistency is high.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Open procedure with e-procurement
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
EU Funded status

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Reliance on external documents for key requirements
Lack of explicit sustainability focus
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Clearly define evaluation criteria within the tender notice.
2. Provide a summary of key requirements directly in the tender notice or ensure all essential documents are easily accessible and clearly labeled.
3. Incorporate explicit sustainability objectives if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline