Skip to main content
Tenders

Reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization studies (11827)

Open
Deadline
39 days left
May 05, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6848231
Value
€1,840,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 28, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 05, 2026

Tender Opening

May 05, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,840,000
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to acquire reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization.
Green Procurement

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements detailed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements detailed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements detailed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements detailed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements detailed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

BPS.docxDOC
BPS.docx -- 89.9 KB

No content extracted

BPS priedai.docxDOC
BPS priedai.docx -- 21.9 KB

No content extracted

Pasi╫lymo forma.docxDOC
Pasi╫lymo forma.docx -- 22.4 KB

No content extracted

SPS.docxDOC
SPS.docx -- 27.1 KB

No content extracted

Sutarties priedas Nr. 2.docxDOC
Sutarties priedas Nr. 2.docx -- 26.4 KB

No content extracted

Sutarties projektas (su panauda).docxDOC
Sutarties projektas (su panauda).docx -- 118.9 KB

No content extracted

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 83.8 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6848231.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization by VšĮ Vilniaus universiteto ligoninė Santaros klinikos in Lithuania.

Technin╙ specifikacija ir ╘kainiai.xlsxXLS
Technin╙ specifikacija ir ╘kainiai.xlsx -- 22.6 KB

No content extracted

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6848231_1.xml

This document outlines the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a file upload for the 'File' criterion within the 'Complete Tender' section.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.4 KB

This document contains a request for an electronic standard procurement document (ESPD) related to the procurement of reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization.

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
PD.zip

This document contains general procurement conditions and declarations required from bidders regarding responsible persons and sanctions, for the purchase of reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for reagents and auxiliary materials for comparative hybridization is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green or social aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures (Open procedure, EU directive). Deadlines appear reasonable given the complexity. CPV code is specified. No disputes are reported. The procedure is clear, but the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the purpose of the procurement is well-defined. Key documents like the contract notice and submission templates are provided. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Three tender documents are available, including a contract notice and submission forms. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts completeness.

AI-extracted requirements section is empty
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. E-procurement is indicated, suggesting a fair process. The deadlines seem reasonable. The provided documents are accessible. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', but the 'No e-submission' flag suggests a potential contradiction or missing detail. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is absent. Document URLs are not provided directly in the summary.

Potential contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. No suspension or disputes are reported. Dates are logical. The 'active' status aligns with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specified CPV code and NUTS code
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Three relevant tender documents available
Indication of E-Procurement

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Potential ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation criteria
Absence of contract start date and financing details

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and provide direct document URLs.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline