Molėtai district municipality, Giedraičiai town, Širvintų str. 35B DGASA installation: design proposals, technical design, construction supervision and PVSV preparation services

This tender is generally well-structured with clear documentation and good fairness, but lacks specific details regarding evaluation criteria and financing, impacting practicality.

The tender follows the 'Open Procedure' and is EU funded, indicating adherence to relevant regulations. The CPV code is specified. There are no immediate indications of disputes. However, the absence of an 'reveal date' and explicit evaluation criteria raises minor concerns about procedural clarity, though not critical legal breaches.

The title and description provide a clear understanding of the required services. Key documents like 'contract_draft' are available and summarized, aiding comprehension. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical capability, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant gaps in clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. The contract duration is specified. Two documents are attached, with one offering a content summary. However, crucial details like estimated value, financing information, and specific submission requirements are missing, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is advertised as 'Open Procedure' and is EU funded, suggesting a commitment to fairness. Full document access is provided for the contract draft. The criteria for evaluation are not disclosed, which is a significant omission that could impact objective assessment and fairness. However, no requirements seem to be tailored to specific companies.

The tender is active with a specified deadline and opening date. E-procurement is a characteristic, which is positive. However, the absence of an explicit e-submission requirement, the undisclosed estimated value, and lack of specific financing information reduce the practicality for bidders in assessing their engagement and resource allocation.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender status is 'active', and there are no disclosed disputes or suspensions. The submission and opening dates are logically ordered. The CPV code is provided, and the contract duration is specified.

The tender is noted as 'EU Funded', which often implies certain sustainability standards, but no specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria are explicitly mentioned. This limits the assessment of sustainability focus.