Skip to main content
Tenders

Services for the creation, implementation, warranty support and modification of the electronic services portal

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6837326
Value
€410,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Tender Opening

April 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€410,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€414,969
Avg. Bids
1.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
1,352 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Services for the creation, implementation, warranty support and modification of the LR RRT electronic services portal

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

NoticePDF
Notice_6837326.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the development, implementation, warranty support, and modification services of the LR RRT electronic services portal in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6837326_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, requiring a file upload as a mandatory element.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for electronic services portal development is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting practicality and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures (Open procedure, Directive 2014/24/EU) and lists a clear CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and there's no indication of disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern depending on national transposition.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is relevant. However, the significant lack of specified eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the tender notice itself creates ambiguity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. Two essential documents (Tender Structure XML, Contract Notice) are attached. However, the absence of detailed requirements in the AI-extracted section means crucial information for a complete understanding of the tender's scope is missing.

AI-extracted requirements section is largely empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements section is very sparse, which, while not directly tailored to specific companies, leaves too much open to interpretation. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria hinders objective assessment by bidders.

Lack of specified evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and includes essential documents. However, the 'Procurement Characteristics' note 'E-Procurement' without further clarification on the submission method, and the 'Issues' list mentions 'No e-submission', which is contradictory or implies limited e-submission capabilities, reducing practicality.

Ambiguity regarding e-submission process
Contract start date not explicitly mentioned
Data Consistency90/100

The basic information, financial data, and timeline details are internally consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, and key fields are populated, indicating good data integrity within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are increasingly important considerations in modern public tenders.

No specific sustainability criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details
Estimated value and contract duration specified
Relevant CPV code provided
Essential tender documents are available

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Vague or absent detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial)
Ambiguity regarding e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed requirements for eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline