Skip to main content
Tenders

2026­VKJ­29­Quartz sand

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
6834411
Value
€935,000
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€935,000
Duration
38 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€241,289
Avg. Bids
3.4
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
93%
108 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Quartz sand is being purchased
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

1. Bendrosios pirkimo s╨lygos (BPS).pdfPDF
1. Bendrosios pirkimo s╨lygos (BPS).pdf -- 368.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6834411.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the purchase of quartz sand in Lithuania, with an estimated value of 935,000 Euros, and submission deadline of April 14, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for quartz sand is generally well-structured with a clear description and a substantial number of supporting documents. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and a specified reveal date for submissions, impacting its overall clarity and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and indicating EU funding. The deadlines appear reasonable given the complexity of a negotiated procedure. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. A significant number of documents are provided, suggesting detailed requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable gap.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. A large volume of documents is attached, covering various aspects of the procurement. However, the lack of a reveal date for submissions and potentially missing content summaries for some documents slightly reduce completeness.

Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. The procedure type (negotiated with prior invitation) implies a structured selection process. The availability of numerous documents promotes transparency. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information regarding the contract start date and financing details, beyond being EU funded, could be improved. The submission deadline is clearly stated.

Missing contract start date
Limited financing details beyond EU funding
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate.

Sustainability50/100

While 'Sustainable procurement requirements' are mentioned in document titles, there are no explicit green procurement goals, social aspects, or innovation focus detailed in the main tender information. The EU funding aspect is noted.

No explicit green procurement goals
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided
Clear title, reference, and CPV code
E-procurement utilized
Estimated value and duration disclosed

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing reveal date for submissions
Limited explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Specify the evaluation criteria clearly within the tender documents.
2. Provide a clear reveal date for submitted tenders.
3. Elaborate on specific green, social, or innovation objectives if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline