Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Collection and disposal of asbestos waste

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6817922
Value
€132,000
Location
Telsiai County, Lithuania
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€132,000
Duration
18 months
Location
Telsiai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€771,462
Avg. Bids
2.8
Competition
Low
SME Winners
95%
989 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

The contracting authority intends to acquire asbestos waste collection and disposal services.
Green Procurement

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for asbestos waste collection and disposal presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, strict adherence to environmental regulations, and competitive pricing, while leveraging the 'Green Procurement' aspect to differentiate.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and compliant asbestos waste management with a commitment to environmental sustainability.

Cost-effective and efficient service delivery ensuring public safety and regulatory adherence.

Key Opportunities
Leveraging the 'Green Procurement' requirement to showcase sustainable practices.
Potential for competitive pricing due to the moderate estimated value and duration.
The absence of specified technical, financial, and eligibility requirements might indicate a less stringent evaluation, allowing for a focus on core service delivery and compliance.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize the bid for specific scoring mechanisms.

Assume a standard evaluation approach focusing on technical merit, price, and compliance. Address all mandatory requirements thoroughly and provide clear, concise information. Highlight strengths in all potential evaluation areas (e.g., experience, safety, environmental commitment).

Potential for strong competition from established local waste management companies.

Thoroughly research potential competitors. Focus on clear differentiation through superior service, demonstrable environmental commitment, and competitive pricing. Highlight any unique certifications or specialized expertise.

Ensuring full compliance with all Lithuanian environmental and hazardous waste regulations, which can be complex.

Engage legal and environmental experts familiar with Lithuanian law. Conduct a thorough review of all applicable regulations and ensure the bid explicitly addresses compliance with each. Include relevant certifications and permits.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A licensed and experienced waste management company with a proven track record in handling hazardous materials, specifically asbestos. The ideal bidder will possess the necessary certifications, specialized equipment, and a strong understanding of Lithuanian environmental and waste disposal regulations. They should also be financially stable and capable of delivering services over an 18-month period.
Key Requirements
Asbestos waste collection and disposal services
Compliance with all relevant environmental and safety regulations for hazardous waste management
Demonstrated technical capability in handling asbestos waste
Adherence to 'Green Procurement' principles
Key Discriminators
Demonstrable commitment to 'Green Procurement' beyond basic compliance, e.g., waste minimization strategies, use of eco-friendly transport, or recycling of non-asbestos components.
Proactive safety protocols and training programs for personnel handling asbestos.
A clear and transparent pricing structure that offers value for money.
Exceptional customer service and communication throughout the contract duration.
Social Value Opportunities
Commitment to employing local workforce where feasible for non-specialized roles, with a focus on training and development in hazardous waste handling.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability & Compliance

Provide detailed evidence of experience in asbestos removal and disposal, including case studies, certifications, and a clear methodology for collection, transport, and disposal. Emphasize adherence to all safety and environmental regulations.

Price

Develop a competitive pricing strategy that reflects the estimated value and duration. Ensure the pricing is transparent and justifiable, highlighting cost-efficiency without compromising safety or quality.

Green Procurement

Clearly articulate how the proposed services will meet or exceed the 'Green Procurement' requirements. Detail any specific initiatives related to waste reduction, energy efficiency in operations, or sustainable disposal methods.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Address Asbestos Handling Expertise
CriticalHigh effort

Provide comprehensive documentation of the company's experience, certifications (e.g., relevant licenses for hazardous waste management), and specialized equipment for asbestos waste collection and disposal. Include detailed operational procedures.

Establishes credibility and meets core service requirements.
Develop a Robust 'Green Procurement' Strategy
CriticalMed effort

Go beyond minimum requirements. Detail specific initiatives for waste minimization, energy-efficient transport, and environmentally sound disposal methods. Quantify benefits where possible.

Provides a significant competitive differentiator and aligns with the contracting authority's objectives.
Offer Competitive and Transparent Pricing
HighMed effort

Conduct thorough cost analysis to present a competitive price that offers value for money. Ensure the pricing structure is clear, itemized, and justifiable, avoiding hidden costs.

Directly influences the evaluation and increases the likelihood of winning on price.
Proactively Address Regulatory Compliance
HighMed effort

Clearly state adherence to all relevant Lithuanian environmental and hazardous waste regulations. Provide copies of necessary permits and licenses. If any specific regulations are unclear, seek clarification from the contracting authority.

Mitigates risk of disqualification and demonstrates due diligence.
Research Competitors and Market Rates
MediumLow effort

Understand the typical pricing and service offerings of companies operating in the Mažeikiai region for similar services. This will inform pricing strategy and highlight unique selling points.

Informs competitive strategy and pricing.
Incorporate Local Employment Commitment
MediumLow effort

Include a commitment to utilize local labor for non-specialized tasks, potentially offering training in hazardous waste handling. This adds a social value dimension.

Enhances social value offering and potentially improves community relations.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as the most reliable, compliant, and environmentally responsible choice for asbestos waste management in the Mažeikiai region. Emphasize a proactive approach to safety and sustainability that goes beyond basic requirements.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed under this category]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed under this category]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed under this category]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed under this category]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed under this category]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo dokumentaiZIP
Pirkimo sąlygos.7z

This document contains the general and special terms and conditions for an open tender procedure to procure asbestos waste collection and disposal services.

NoticePDF
Notice_6817922.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the collection and disposal of asbestos waste services by the Mažeikiai District Municipality Administration in Lithuania.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6817922_1.xml

This document contains the structure for a complete tender submission, including a mandatory file upload for the open procedure of asbestos waste collection and disposal services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for asbestos waste collection and disposal is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and sustainability aspects. The estimated value and duration are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. While deadlines are present, the opening date is immediately after the submission deadline, which might be tight. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clear, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

Opening date immediately after submission deadline
Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed, impacting overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. Three tender documents are attached, including a contract notice and procurement documents. However, the lack of specific requirements in key areas like exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as missing reveal date, reduces completeness.

Missing reveal date
No specific exclusion grounds provided
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the CPV code is appropriate. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided.

Contradiction regarding e-submission
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, although the opening date is very close to the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common sustainability considerations in public tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.

No mention of green procurement
No mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value specified
Appropriate CPV code provided
Tender documents are available
Open procedure and e-procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific requirements in key tender sections
Potential issues with e-submission clarity
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with e-procurement principles.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline