Skip to main content
Tenders

Intraocular lenses (No. 11266-1)

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6806102
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vilnius County, Lithuania
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
37 months
Location
Vilnius County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€50,148
Avg. Bids
7.2
Competition
High
SME Winners
99%
54,649 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Intraocular lenses, 36 months.
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Pirkimo sąlygosDOC
Pirkimo sąlygos.docx

This document contains the procurement conditions for intraocular lenses for a 36-month period, issued by Vilnius University Hospital.

Techninė specifikacija ir pasiūlymo kainaDOC
Priedas Nr.1_Techninės specifikacijos projekt...

No content extracted

Sutarties projektasDOC
Priedas Nr.2_Viešojo pirkimo sutarties projek...

This document contains the draft contract for the purchase of intraocular lenses over 36 months, outlining general and special conditions, definitions, and the subject of the contract.

Tiekėjo (subtiekėjo) deklaracija dėl sankcijųDOC
Priedas Nr.3_Tiekėjo (subtiekėjo) deklaracija...

This document contains a supplier's declaration confirming that their entity and any subcontractors do not violate EU sanctions related to Russia's actions in Ukraine.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 78.4 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6806102.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the procurement of intraocular lenses for 36 months by the Vilnius University Hospital in Lithuania.

README.txtTXT
README.txt -- 835 B

This document contains a README file with technical specifications and potentially other related files for a tender concerning intraocular lenses over 36 months.

Tender Structure XML - Cycle 1XML
c4t_6806102_1.xml

This document contains the tender structure for an open procedure evaluating the lowest price for intraocular lenses over 36 months, requiring a complete tender file submission.

espd-request.xmlXML
espd-request.xml -- 102.8 KB

This document contains a request for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for intraocular lenses for a 36-month period.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for intraocular lenses is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows EU procurement rules (Code: 2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. The procedure is open, and essential documents like the contract draft and tender conditions are provided. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender title, description, and CPV code are clear. Key documents like the contract draft and tender conditions are available, providing a good understanding of the procurement object. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding financing are missing, which affects the completeness of the financial information.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Financing info missing
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with full document access, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement and objective criteria (implied by 'lowest price' in XML structure) are positive. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which is practical. However, the absence of explicit financing information and the lack of a clear contract start date (beyond duration) reduce its practicality. The deadline, while within typical ranges, could be considered tight given the document count.

Financing info missing
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and contract duration are populated. The dates provided (submission, opening) are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure with full document access
Clear CPV code and contract duration
EU Funded and E-Procurement utilized
Draft contract and tender conditions provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of financing information

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria clearly.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
3. Provide details on financing arrangements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline