Skip to main content
Tenders

Design services (for Vilniaus g.1, Joniškis town)

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
6801292
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Siauliai County, Lithuania
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
36 months
Location
Siauliai County
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€131,412
Avg. Bids
3.9
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
98%
2,076 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Part of an administrative building (Joniškis Pharmacy building uk. 2485) Vilniaus g. 1, Joniškis
Green ProcurementEU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

10 priedas. Suteikt╓ paslaug╓ s╨ra╒as AK-1.docxDOC
10 priedas. Suteikt╓ paslaug╓ s╨ra╒as AK-1.do... -- 24.3 KB

No content extracted

11 priedas. Si╫lom╓ specialist╓ s╨ra╒as AK-1.docxDOC
11 priedas. Si╫lom╓ specialist╓ s╨ra╒as AK-1.... -- 32.0 KB

No content extracted

1 priedas. Terminai AK-1.docxDOC
1 priedas. Terminai AK-1.docx -- 19.2 KB

No content extracted

2 priedas. Technin╙ specifikacija AK-1.docxDOC
2 priedas. Technin╙ specifikacija AK-1.docx -- 63.9 KB

No content extracted

3 priedas. Pa╒alinimo pagrindai AK-1.docxDOC
3 priedas. Pa╒alinimo pagrindai AK-1.docx -- 42.3 KB

No content extracted

4 priedas. Kvalifikaciniai reikalavimai AK-1.docxDOC
4 priedas. Kvalifikaciniai reikalavimai AK-1.... -- 49.8 KB

No content extracted

5 priedas. EBVPD AK-1.pdfPDF
5 priedas. EBVPD AK-1.pdf -- 93.3 KB

No content extracted

NoticePDF
Notice_6801292.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for architectural design services for the administrative building part (Joniškis Pharmacy building uk. 2485) at Vilniaus g. 1, Joniškis, Lithuania.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for architectural design services is generally well-structured, with a clear description and a good number of supporting documents. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria are notable weaknesses.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and uses the correct CPV code. The procedure is open, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. The submission deadline appears reasonable given the contract duration, though the opening date is very close.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the title is specific. However, the AI-extracted requirements section is empty, and the content of several attached documents is not summarized, potentially hindering full understanding without manual review.

AI-extracted requirements are not listed.
Content of several documents is not summarized.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the lack of content summaries for some reduces completeness.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. There are no explicitly tailored requirements for specific companies. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could impact fairness if not clearly defined within the documents.

Evaluation criteria are not specified in the main tender information.
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a direct URL for document access and the lack of explicit financing information or contract start date reduce practicality. The submission deadline is also quite close to the opening date.

No direct URL for document access provided.
Financing information is not explicitly stated.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical, with the submission deadline preceding the opening date.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No specific green procurement criteria mentioned.
No specific social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear description of services and location.
Open procedure and e-procurement utilized.
Comprehensive set of attached documents.
Correct CPV code and NUTS code provided.

Concerns

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Evaluation criteria are not explicitly stated.
Content summaries missing for several key documents.
Lack of specific sustainability or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
3. Provide content summaries for all attached documents to enhance clarity.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline